Tag Archives: Third Reich

THE MORNING AFTER

I had better get busy with this article because even though it’s still the morning after, it’s getting close to being the “afternoon after.” I certainly didn’t expect Donald Trump to win the presidency. From all accounts and media outlets, including Fox News, Mr. Trump’s chances of winning were estimated to be slim to even none. He was drug through the mud like no political candidate had ever been. Some Democrats, including First Lady, Michelle Obama, were expressing utter shock at what he was overheard saying on the Access Hollywood tape, even though fowl-mouthed rapper Jay Z and his wife Beyoncé are included among those in the Obama inner circle.

In the short time I’ve been at my desk and perused social media, I have seen so much vitriol and hatred coming from Democrats directed at Donald Trump and his supporters. I’m also seeing some Democrats express disbelief that their gal, Hillary lost. “Oh, but she’s the smartest, most caring woman in the world.” Get real, she screws up everything she touches. Hey, Democrats, not everyone agrees with you. Here’s a list of things, not in any particular order.

  • Not everyone thinks government is all powerful, all loving, and always perfect. Some of us believe that the private sector does a lot of things much better than government and should be left to do so. That was one of the principles on which this country was founded, and many of us believe in this 240-year-old principle.
  • Not everyone thinks that it’s okay to kill the unborn just because carrying that child to term is inconvenient for the mother. Science has proven that upon conception that fertilized egg takes on human characteristics such as brain and heart activity.
  • Many of us respect the armed forces and feel that a strong military is necessary to the well-being of our nation and the safety of our citizens.
  • There are those of us who respect our nation’s local law enforcement. And while there are certainly “bad cops” out there, most our policemen and women are fine people who deserve our respect as they work from day to day to protect us from criminal activity and assist us when necessary.
  • We live in the last half of the second decade of the twenty-first century. Slavery ended in 1865 and additional civil rights legislation was pass over a half-century ago. While racism exists and continues to exist until Christ returns and sets up his 1000 year reign here on earth, most of us believe in and have worked to established equal opportunity, but realize that with equal opportunity, we cannot guarantee equal outcome.
  • Most of us believe that we have the right to exercise our freedom of speech, especially when it comes to holding our government officials accountable; and don’t like the way you have many hurled the “racist” accusation at those who have disagreed with the policies of the first black president, Barak Obama. You have also come up with the ridiculous notions that the American flag is racist, and that chanting “USA” is racist. It seems that whenever you can’t decide on what to call those with whom you disagree, you, with reckless abandon, just hurl the term racist. In fact, you make up the definition of racism to suit your needs of the moment. Again, many of us just don’t like that.
  • Many of us question the existence of man-made climate change, and there are many articles written by respected scientists who have refuted this theory. However, Democrats have consistently hurled insults and called those who didn’t agree with them unflattering names. Again, not everyone agrees with you on this issue and many of us were fearful of the ridiculous regulations that were being crammed down our throats in the name of climate change.
  • Many of us don’t agree with you in your efforts to soak the rich and screw over businesses. These are the entities who issue our paychecks. When our employers prosper, we, the middle class, tend to do better.
  • Most of us don’t want government-run healthcare. We warned if the dangers when the ACA was being crammed down our throats using every legislative trick in the book. Our nation’s healthcare system is a mess. Democrats this is your fault. You own it; lock, stock, and barrel. Now it looks like it will be up to the Republicans and the Trump administration to fix it. Thanks a lot, Dems!
  • Most of us want to win the war on Islamic terrorism and believe we need to define the problem in order to solve it. We believe that ISIS is the twenty-first century Third Reich and must be destroyed, and never allowed in this country.
  • Immigration: You Democrats have never acknowledged that there is a difference between legal and illegal immigration. When someone says they’re against illegal immigration, you make no distinction between legal and illegal and hurl the xenophobia accusation. We want illegal immigration diminished and feel that a wall on the Mexican border will go a long ways in solving this problem.
  • A lot of us would like to be able to defend ourselves from an attacker either before or after the police are called. We’d rather not have the police come, tag our dead bodies, and call the morgue to come and get us.
  • Most of us want to maintain Israel as a trusted ally. If fact, it’s necessary. God has indicated that he will punish those who turn their backs on Israel.

The above outlines many of the areas where the two major political parties disagree, and as I’ve been saying all along, liberals, Democrats, progressives, or whatever it is they want to call themselves these days can’t seem to believe that anyone could possibly have different view. And if they have different views, they’re stupid and evil. Furthermore, Democrats don’t appear to believe in free speech unless they agree with the speech.

I’ve been called a sore winner this morning, and that’s probably right. I want to lash out. I want to do the same things to Democrats that they did to me eight years ago and have continued to do to me and other conservatives since then. I’m a flawed individual, but grateful that those flaws have been paid for.

Facebooktwitter

ANOTHER THIRD REICH, OBAMA VS. HITLER

The following meme from America Secede or Die, which outlines the similarities of President Obama to Adolph Hitler, was shared by a Facebook friend. Is another Third Reich coming?

From Secede or Die

From Secede or Die

After I shared the meme, a liberal FB friend indicated that none of it was true and if Obama was going to accomplish these things, he had a lot of work to do before Hillary takes over. While a couple maybe “iffy,” this meme is more accurate than not.

The following will analyze the allegations on the meme and illustrate how history is indeed repeating itself and the similarities in the times leading up to the Third Reich compared to what’s happening in America now.

Both took control over national healthcare systems.

Liberals will refute that Obamacare is a takeover of our healthcare system. Instead, they will say that it’s a beautiful piece of legislation that is allowing those without health insurance to now acquire health insurance. That’s garbage and we know it. Because so much has been written about Obamacare, I won’t reiterate. However, a single-payer system is what all liberals, including the current president have as their goal, and should Hillary get elected. Obama and his liberal henchmen have put in place a system by which complete control of our nation’s healthcare can be achieved.

Both nationalized school curriculum, eliminated religion.

Taking Christ out of our public schools began with the Supreme Court decisions in 1962 and 1963, Engel v. Vitale and Abington School District v. Schempp, which took prayer out of the public schools.  Regarding nationalizing school curriculums, according to The Report Card in an article dated January 12, 2014, entitled “ObamaCore: The Nationalizing of Public Education,” since the founding of the Department of Education in 1978, the potential has existed for K-12 education to be nationalized. Common Core has provided a below the radar platform for the nationalization of education because it has been tied to Race to the Top funds.Nationalizing public education..

Both mock and remove God from public places.

In 2006, Illinois State Senator, Barak Hussein Obama, mocked the Sermon on the Mount, and the books of the Bible, Leviticus and Deuteronomy, taking much of the scripture out of context.

Also on June 17 of this year, BHO gave a speech at an LGBT fundraiser where he openly mocked scripture and its Author. Not the least among them were eight different times where he affirmed his absolute love and passion for the things that God has declared in his word to be an abomination. From a spiritual perspective, it is terrifying to realize the judgment that he is calling down upon this nation by his open rebellion and defiance of the Holy God of Israel. Obama gives LGBT speech, openly mocking religion.

While the current president may not have physically have removed references to God from the public place, his actions and attitude toward Christianity speaks for itself.

Both allowed the state to control child care centers. 

Obama launches 80 billion child care push. In an article dated April 25, 2016, in freebeacon.com, new rules stemming from the school lunch law championed by first lady, Michelle Obama, are banning popular children’s cereals like Frosted Flakes in daycare centers. Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service issued a final rule that will affect more than 3 million children in daycare centers centers across the country. The regulation will only allow daycare centers to serve juice once a day, will ban fried foods, and encourage centers to not add honey to a child’s yogurt. Michelle Obama’s banning certain foods at day cares.

While this certainly does sound good and it’s never too early to start a child off in the right direction when it comes to nutrition, do we want the government involved in this. Do we want the government eventually telling us what we can and cannot feed our children? Do you really think the government will stop at this? Actually, this is just one of a long string of actions in an attempt to raise and indoctrinate our children.

Both rapidly enforced and encouraged anti-gun legislation.

If you can’t see the parallel of President Obama to Adolph Hitler in this one, maybe you need to start taking one or more of those brain enhancing supplements that are widely advertised.

Both militarized police forces and used military for homeland operation.

I think the creator of tis meme probably meant nationalizing our local police forces. Militarizing our police forces means giving our police access to weapons used by the military. Obama, if anything has attempted to limit what our police can use in maintaining law and order.

Because of his negative comments about our nation’s policemen and women, it’s no secret that President Obama doesn’t care for our local police forces. According to policeone.com, in his now famous July 2009 press conference, President Obama responded to a question about the arrest of Harvard Professor, Henry Gates by stating his belief that the “Cambridge police acted stupidly.” This was before the current president knew the facts of the incident. In this same conference, the president indicated that “we should work with local law enforcement to improve policing techniques to eliminate bias.” Liberals like to talk about buzzwords for racism, sexism, and all the other isms. Well, these words do seem like buzz words for possibly down the road, nationalizing our local police departments. The federalization of local law enforcement.

Both established federal programs to spy on citizens.

While campaigning in 2008, candidate Barak Obama promised to preside over the most transparent administration in the history of the United States, no more secrecy. However, as president, he has embraced many of the same domestic surveillance programs he once derided as a candidate. To see a brief history of his stance: Government surveillance then and now.

Both encouraged citizens to be paranoid of one another.

This is the only statement on the meme that might be questionable. I haven’t actually heard the current president encourage paranoia, but I did hear him, in a speech, asking people to be on the lookout for those who disagreed with his policies. Of course this violates the very framework in which this country was founded. The freedom to hold government accountable and the freedom to say you don’t like what’s taking place in government if you don’t.

Both made executive orders without proper approval.

Duh! If I have to explain this to you…!

We’ve all read accounts of the rise of Adolph Hitler and how the German people adored him. When bad things began to happen, people were in denial. Also, Hitler began blaming the Jews for all his problems, just like Obama blames Republicans for the hurdles he has faced when attempting to incorporate his anti-American agenda into the country. Liberals laugh when any of this is brought up, but I say, there are parallels between what’s taking place now and what took place leading up to the first Third Reich. Is Obama leading us up to another Third Reich?

Facebooktwitter

THE LIBERAL WAR ON GUNS, AGAIN!

Whenever there’s a mass shooting, the first thing the current president pontificates about is gun violence and how we need more gun laws in order to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Chicago mayor and White House staffer under Clinton and Obama, Rahm Emanuel, has always said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” Of course, Rahm, aka “Dead Fish” meant that another crisis would allow the liberals to further constrict our liberties and therefore allow the government more control over our lives.

The first time I ever shot a gun, I was in my twenties. My apartment had been broken into and I asked my Dad to either give me one of his guns or go with me to buy a gun; then teach me to shoot it. He gave me one of his and the first time I shot it, I fully realized just what power I held in my hands. I had the power to kill someone. Before he would let me take the gun home with me, Daddy asked me, “Are you prepared to use the gun? If you’re not, I won’t let you have it. If you’re not going to use it and be confident in using it, a perpetrator will just wrestle it away from you and perhaps use it on you.” I still have that gun.

Ever since I can remember, Daddy kept a shotgun and a rifle in the back of his closet and a revolver in the night stand drawer on his side of the bed. I think the shotgun and rifle were always loaded and the bullets for the revolver were in the nightstand drawer beside Mama’s side of the bed. From my earliest remembrance, I was not allowed to touch Daddy’s closet door and I didn’t. Furthermore, I was not allowed to touch either of the night stands on either side of their bed. Those places in their bedroom were off-limits to me, plain and simple. There was only a few times I remember Daddy loading the revolver and that was when there had been some sort of incident in Cullman, Alabama.

Fast forward to becoming a teenager and learning to drive. Upon getting my driver’s license, I began driving and there was never a thought as to the deadly weapon I was in charge of. And there still isn’t. When I get in one of my vehicles to go somewhere, I never think about the fact that I’m in control of a deadly weapon, but I am. In fact, I’m constantly touching things that are deadly: a sharp knife, a bottle of drain cleaner, ant hill crystals, etc.

With all this dangerous stuff around at all times, why are liberals continually focusing on guns? Why are they always getting bent out of shape at the mention of the National Rifle Association and not at the mention of one of the many automobile clubs around? The National Rifle Association promotes gun ownership and gun safety while most sanctioned automobile clubs promote the ownership of automobiles and automobile safety.

My best guess that a liberal might give would be that the sole purpose of a gun is to kill whether it be an animal of a person. Whereas, automobiles, drain cleaner, knives, and ant hill crystals have purposes other than to kill. And we all need those things.

There is something else that can be deadly that, in my opinion, none of us need, but some have as pets are big snakes, boa constrictors come to mind. I’ve known a few people that have had them as pets; all guys and in college. If it gets mad, a large boa constrictor can wrap around a person and squeeze in just the right way and kill the person. And what good is a boa constrictor? It’s not going to greet you and the door with its tail wagging. It’s not going to come sit in your lap and watch television with you. It’s not smart to let it sleep in the bed with you. Furthermore, girls are probably not going to like it at all. So why don’t liberals declare war on having boa constrictors as pets? Who needs a boa constrictor?

Since the Umpqua Community College shooting, I’ve seen some of the most ridiculous posts by liberals. Many citing deaths of children, teenagers steeling their Dads’ guns and using the guns to commit murder. But children have been known to get car keys, start the car, and attempt to drive. Teenagers too young to drive have also been knows to do the same.

Nowhere in the constitution are automobiles, knives, ant hill crystals, drain cleaner, or boa constrictors addressed. The right to bear arms is addressed in the second amendment of the constitution and was put there so that citizens could protect themselves from tyrannical government and intruders.

Liberals claim their intentions with gun control is to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. We all know that’s a joke. We also know that the cities with the strictest gun control laws seem to have the highest gun violence rates.

During the Third Reich, guns were confiscated from all citizens. When the Nazi regime was sending many of its citizens, including Jewish citizens off to the death camps, the people were unable to fight back because they had no guns. Liberals laugh at this and say it couldn’t happen here because our current president and his liberal henchman are such caring persons that they would never do such a thing. I say to this, B.S.

Liberals continue to claim that they are not attempting to abscond with all our guns, but only certain individuals should be allowed to have guns. In other words, you must pass a background check. Well, most states have these in place. The left also wants to ban certain types of firearms. A liberal Facebook friend once posted that there is absolutely no need for anyone to own assault rifles. So, now you have liberals telling us what we need and don’t need. Sounds like communism to me.

There’s so much that I could write about liberals and their goal of creating a society where only criminals and government officials can have guns, thereby asserting additional controls over the populace. But I’ll leave it for another day.

Facebooktwitter