Tag Archives: Obama Administration

COLLEGE-EDUCATED WHITE WOMEN WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP

According to an article written by Jessica Chasmar in the Washington Times dated April 3, 2017, Tina Fey warns female Trump voters: His election will come back to haunt you, comedian and actress, Tina Fey, warned the college-educated white women who voted for President Trump to wake up and resist, because his presidency will eventually bring long-lasting consequences to their lives. Ms. Fey spoke about this, and the presidential election in an interview with ACLU executives during a celebrity Facebook Live fundraiser for the nonprofit this past Friday night (3/31).

Ms. Chasmar quotes the comedian/actress as saying: “A lot of this election was turned by, kind of, white college-educated women who now would maybe like to forget about this election and go back to watching HGTV. And I would want to urge them to, like, you can’t look away, because it doesn’t affect you this minute, but it’s going to affect you eventually.” Ms. Fey went on to say that it’s important for those women not to ignore “what is happening” now that the election is over.

First of all, Ms. Fey only directs her comments to white college-educated women. What about black college-educated women, Hispanic college-educated women, Asian college-educated women, etc.? Does she not feel as though these other college-educated women who may have voted for Donald Trump are not going to be “eventually affected” by his election to the presidency?

Much to my disappointment, there wasn’t much else to the article. I wanted Ms. Fey to address how the election of Donald Trump was going to negatively affect college-educated white women because I’m a college-educated white woman, who voted for Donald Trump, and I’ll also throw into the mix that I’m single.

As a single woman, regardless of education level or race, I have to support myself, which includes planning for my retirement. Donald Trump has promised us tax reform which, hopefully, will lower taxes for everyone, including the middle class, the wealthy, and businesses. It’s definitely in my best interest be allowed to keep as much of my paycheck as possible. Remember, I’m all I have. Furthermore, it’s the wealthy, the business owners who create jobs and hire people like me. Wouldn’t it be in my best interest if they got tax breaks also? I would have a better chance of getting hired. And when I do, I have a better chance of receiving improved benefits and salary increases. Squeezing the wealthy and the business owners, like Hillary wanted to do, would just make my chances of being laid off or the diminishing of my benefits greater. President Trump gets the nod on this one.

Also, as a single woman, it’s important for me to feel safe wherever I am…in my home, in my car, while I’m traveling, and while I’m in public places. The immediate past president, Barack Obama, demonized our nation’s local police forces, and Hillary Clinton was on track to continue to do so had she been elected president. During the Obama presidency, there was all sorts of discussion about limiting what the police could do and not do in their efforts to make our communities safer. Having a police force with the power to protect law-abiding citizens like me from the criminal element is essential to my well-being. President Trump and his administration, along with the GOP, are pro-law enforcement, Democrats don’t appear to be on the side of law enforcement. Another nod goes to President Trump.

While we have enough problems with domestic crime in the United States, since 9/11/2001, terrorist attacks on U.S. soil factor in as well. Plus, the Obama administration exacerbated the situation by not only allowing the rise of ISIS, the most brutal organization in the history of the planet, but by minimizing their danger, especially when it comes to attacks in the U.S. And ISIS is not the only Islamic terrorist organization out there. It goes without saying that my well-being is also affected by the state of the U.S. military. The Obama administration, along with most Democrat administrations generally enforce a weakening of our military. Another nod to President Trump.

The same logic can be applied to immigration policies. Allowing illegal aliens, many of them with criminal histories, to pour into the United States, diminishes the well-being of the single woman. Thus, the building of the Mexican border wall and improvement in vetting processes for non-U.S. citizens entering the country, are in the best interest of single-women. The nod goes to President Trump.

As a woman, not just a single college educated white woman, having access to quality health care is very important to her well-being. Obama and the Democrats certain screwed that one up for us. This single, college-educated white woman is working twelve to fourteen hours per day trying to make her small business not only profitable, but prosperous so she doesn’t have to depend on the government. In short, I want to make money. Unfathomably high health insurance premiums and deductibles forced on us by the Obama administration and the Democrats, with the same to look forward to in a Hilary Clinton administration is not helping women. In fact, it’s not helping men either.  The nod goes, once again, to guess who.

It’s a rare happening for liberals to actually take a break from hurling epithets and fraudulent accusations at those who disagree with them; and actually discuss relevant issues. When they do, they may bring up the equal work for equal pay topic regarding women allegedly being paid less than men for supposedly equal work. Legislation preventing this sort of discrimination was passed in 1963. I have written much on this topic in the past and won’t re-hash here, except to refer you to the previous paragraph where I sited that it was in a single woman’s best interest for taxes to be lower for everyone so that potential employers will prosper, resulting in better raises, benefits, etc. If a woman should find herself in an unfair situation, having a robust economy where jobs with better pay and benefits are available, certainly benefits her. Another nod to President Trump.

Even though Tina Fey was directing her comments toward white college-educated women, and I focused on single women in this piece, I don’t understand why she didn’t include other women. Why would it be any different for them? After reading this story in several other outlets, CNN and USA Magazine were the only publications that bothered to elaborate. And then, their elaborations didn’t amount to much. In fact, CNN only indicated that Ms. Fey remarked that the gains made by women over the last 100 years were under attack. And to that I say, “Exactly which of those gains are under attack?”

Ending this article feeling confused shouldn’t be a surprise to me. This college-educated white woman is a deplorable uneducated redneck. But wait…if Trump supporters are deplorable uneducated rednecks, I think Ms. Fey is the one confused.

Facebooktwitter

THREATS AND INTIMIDATION

Have we become a country where our day to day behavior can be determined by threats and intimidation? It certainly appears that way.

The vote of the electors of the Electoral College which makes the nation’s president elect the official next president usually goes off without a hitch. It’s a formality which might take up a half-minute on the news.

This year, as we all know, was an exception. President Elect, Donald Trump, captured the most electoral votes and surpassed the required number to become the next president on election night, November 8, 2016. Even though Democrat nominee, Hillary Clinton, conceded the election to Mr. Trump. Democrats, who could not fathom that Clinton could have lost the election, immediately fought back. There was rioting in the streets, crying on college campuses and elsewhere, the popping up of support groups for those who were experiencing severe angst and trauma from the election results, and so on and so forth.

Since the election night, the Democrats have stopped at nothing to de-legitimize the election results and the upcoming presidency of Donald Trump. First, they demanded recounts in states where the Trump campaign flipped from blue to red. Did the Democrats use threats and intimidation in over-seeing the re-counting of the votes? If they did, it didn’t work.

In a last-ditch effort to de-legitimize Donald Trump, and in their dreams, to maybe overturn the election, they attempted to get electors, especially in the states that Trump won, to re-consider and vote for Hillary. From various news sources, I learned that emails numbering more than 2000 were sent to each elector, even in Alabama where Trump received over 60% of the vote. Furthermore, I learned that electors in the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania were receiving death threats in order to make them change their votes.

We live in the United States of America where any form of threats and intimidation by the government or any political party of law-abiding citizens should never take place under any circumstance. But sadly, threats and intimidation have become a popular tool of the Democrat party to get what they want.

I’ve been reading, mostly on social media, that many musicians and refusing to perform at Donald Trump’s inauguration. Earlier today, I read an article about Andrea Bocelli, a friend of the president elect, had accepted an invitation to entertain, but had to back out because of the threats and intimidation he was receiving from the left. All the social media posts about this have come from the left. Could this be fake news? Be that as it may, I thought that maybe Mr. Trump could go the country music route. He could also invite second or third tier acts who might be looking for exposure. And what better way to get it that to perform at a presidential inauguration?

But wait. If a good local or regional singer or band who has aspirations of maybe one day getting to Hollywood, Chicago, New York, or maybe even Nashville were to perform for President Elect Trump’s inauguration, would they be branded for life by the Hollywood, Chicago, New York, or Nashville leftists (and there are some leftists in Nashville). Regardless of how good the individual or group is, would Hollywood automatically reject them for having performed for Donald Trump? The implication of threats and intimidation; could they possibly prevent young artists from accepting the “gig of their dreams?”

A Trump presidency should give this nation at least four relief from what has been the continuing progression of government taking over as many aspects of our lives as possible. If President Trump can get Obamacare repealed in its entirety or replaced with something much less insidious, maybe we can get a little relief on our health insurance premiums. If all those federal lands that Obama placed off limits to oil and natural gas exploration, can be re-opened for these activities, we could take some giant steps toward becoming energy independent, meaning our personal energy costs would decrease, and the fear of massive increases which were championed by the Obama administration would cease to exist.

The left, including the mainstream media, sadly has become an enemy of the United States of America. It is an enemy that will always be with us and will always use threats and intimidation to change our behavior, similar to the threats and intimidation used in the George Orwell novel, “1984.” Threats and intimidation includes not only threats to our health and property, but will include the hurling of false accusations at those of us who refuse to tow their line, in an effort to weaken us or brainwash us into assuming their way of thinking, again like what was written in the novel, “1984.”

Many of us, in church, with our families, or just by ourselves, have prayed for our country during the Obama administration because we were afraid of the results of the implementation of many of Obama’s policies. Prayers for our country cannot stop. In fact, prayer is going to be even more important. The threats and intimidation that will continue from the left will weaken us at times and may even tempt us to flip to the other side. Some say it’s easy to be a liberal. I wouldn’t know. So, please keep fighting the good fight because we now have a chance to take our country back.

Facebooktwitter

WAR ON CHRISTIANITY – DOES IT REALLY EXIST?

Is there an increasing hostility to Christian values and religious freedoms in our country today?

According to townhall.com, there is and in an article dated May 2, 2016, Michael Brown cites the following examples possibly indicating that there is indeed a war on Christianity in the United States.

  1. The NCAA announced that it will not hold any men’s and women’s Final Four basketball events in a city that discriminates against anyone based on sexual orientation or gender identity. In its official statement, the NCAA declared that the board’s decision follows the recent actions of legislatures in several states, which have passed laws allowing residents to refuse to provide services to some people based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. It is the opinion of Mr. Brown that not only has the NCAA grossly mischaracterized these recent laws, but it is now guilty of discriminating against biblically-based beliefs and declaring than no Final Four game will be held in any city that does not allow men to use women’s bathrooms or that protects a Christian photographer from being forced to shot a same-sex wedding.
  2. The Colorado Supreme Court has chosen not to hear the case of Christian baker Jack Phillips who was previously ordered by the Colorado Civil Rights Commission to create cakes for same-sex celebrations, re-educate his staff, and file quarterly compliance reports for two years. The Court declined to hear the case, meaning that the state’s Civil Rights Commission not only has the power to require a bakery to make same-sex wedding cakes, but also to require that baker to re-educate his staff and file regular reports proving that he is baking those cakes. I’ve said many times before that a private business owner should have the right to refuse business for any reason. Forcing Mr. Phillips to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding, then ordering him to re-educate his staff and file regular compliance reports is just unfathomable in the United States of America. This is totalitarianism at its height.
  3. Eric Walsh, the highly-qualified, newly-hired District Health Director with the Georgia Department of Public Health was fired because of the content of his sermons as a Seventh Day Adventist minister. According to his attorney, Jeremy Dys, of First Liberty, no one in this country should be fired from their job for something that was said in a church or from a pulpit during a sermon. According to attorney Davis French, working for former president Bush and current president Obama to combat AIDS, serving as a board member of the Latino Health Collaborative, and starting California’s first city-run clinic for low-income families dealing with HIV/AIDS wasn’t sufficient to overcome the horror at Walsh’s Christian views. So, it sounds like Dr. Walsh was ministering to the poor and down-trodden while preaching the word of God. Does this remind you of someone else?
  4. Several senators have introduced a bill that would deem all efforts to change someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity an unfair or deceptive act of practice under the Federal Trade Commission Act. In other words, it would be illegal to counsel someone struggling with same-sex attraction or gender identity confusion, but it would be perfectly legal to encourage someone to embrace those attractions or act on that confusion. If this new bill becomes law, it would not only be considered unethical to help some deal with his same-sex attractions, it would be illegal. It would also be illegal to help a person get to the root of his gender confusion. However, it would be perfectly legal for a counsel to recommend hormone blockers for a 10 year old to stop the onset of puberty and then to prepare that child for sex-change surgery as soon as he or she was old enough.
  5. The NBA announced that it will not hold next year’s All-Star game in Charlotte, North Carolina unless the state changes HB2, the Bathroom Privacy Act. So, unless North Carolina agrees to let grown men use women’s locker rooms and changing facilities, and unless it removes protections for religious liberties, it will be punished.
  6. The Department of Education has decided that Religious schools that receive federal money, yet obtain federal exemptions to allegedly discriminate against LGBT students and employees will have their waivers posted online for public view. This means that any Christian institution receiving federal money and at the same time holding to biblical morality and sexuality could suffer adverse consequences.
  7. Breitbart News has reported that a federal court sides with a transgender student who insisted that the Obama administration’s reading of Federal Title IX rules would allow her to choose her own bathroom at her Virginia high school. In other worlds, no matter what kind of hardship or inconvenience this puts on the rest of the students, without any type of scientific proof that a child is actually transgender, the perceived needs of the one or two struggling children will be imposed on the other 1,000 and the Obama administration will come after your school if you fail to comply.

Scary? I’d say so. I keep thinking at some point the American people will have had enough of this foolishness and start to take matters into their own hands by perhaps holding demonstrations all over the country and busing to Washington to confront our public officials face to face. Has the conservative faction of this nation become too nice and too dignified to hold demonstrations and get in someone’s face? It would appear so. Liberals certainly don’t hesitate to protest. In fact liberals don’t hesitate to also destroy property and injure anyone who might get in their way.

So, does the war on Christianity really exist? You decide.

I’m at the point where I think that the only thing that will save and preserve the United States of America as we know it will be outright demonstrations. Will the good people of the United States do it or will be United States of America be lost forever?

Facebooktwitter

CALLING FOR IMPEACHMENT OF OBAMA

According to 100percentfedup.com, senior Obama administration officials are expressing concern that congressional attempts to tighten laws preventing terrorists from entering the United States could violate the Iran nuclear agreement and prompt Tehran to walk away from the agreement.

Congress is considering measures that would tighten the Visa Waiver Program to make it harder for potential terrorists to legally enter the United States by increasing restrictions on individuals who have travelled to countries with prominent terrorist organizations from bypassing security checks upon entering the United States.

Iranian officials have, in recent days, repeatedly issued threatening statements to the Obama administration, saying that such moves would violate the nuclear agreement, and the Obama administration last week conveyed the Iranian anger to American lawmakers.

Stephen Mull, the State Department official in charge of implementing the Iran deal, warned the Senate Foreign Relations Committee late last week that these congressional efforts could have a very negative impact on the deal.

Sources working with Congress on the Iran deal criticized the Obama administration for attempting to stymie increased action on terrorism due to its desire to preserve the nuclear deal.

According to the Obama administration’s latest interpretation, the nuclear deal allows Iran to test ballistic missiles in violation of international law, but does not allow Congress to prevent terrorists from coming into the United States, Omri Ceren, the managing director of press and strategy at The Israel Project, a S.C based organization that works with journalists on Middle East issues, told the Washington Free Beacon.

Seyed Araqchi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister also warned that Iran is prepared to take action against the United States for implementing visa restrictions.

Now, isn’t this just great? The country of Iran is jerking the chain of the United States of America and the current administration is letting them do it. It looks like Obama and his henchmen are thwarting attempts of Congress to keep the American people safe because Iran doesn’t like what we’re doing.

The number one job of the president of the United States is to protect this nation and its people, and it doesn’t look like he’s doing that. This president appears to be deliberately putting the wishes of Iran, the largest state sponsor of terrorism on the planet, in front of his primary duty to protect the American people. This is straight forward intentional dereliction of duty. He should be impeached.

By Obama’s actions and the actions of his administration, the United States of American and its citizens have been put in danger.

You can’t impeach someone in office because you don’t like their policies or their philosophy of governing, but if that official deliberately puts the United States and its citizens in harm’s way, that’s grounds for impeachment.

I hereby call for the impeachment of the President of the United States, one, Barak Obama.

Facebooktwitter

DISTURBING THINGS

The Paris attacks of November 13, 2015, of which ISIS has claimed credit, seem to have unleashed many disturbing things. The current president’s response to these attacks is unprecedented for any past leader of the free world. He has done nothing to insure the American people that he intends to carry out the oath he has taken twice where he swore to uphold the constitution of the United States of America, therefore, protect the Unites States and its citizens from harm. I’ve never commented on this, but I’m going to now. I am convinced that the president of the United States is either a Muslim or a strong Muslim sympathizer. There’s just too much evidence point the above. Every chance he has, he disses Christianity and tells us that we shouldn’t judge the Islam by the actions of a few. However, he has indicated that all conservatives/Republicans are his enemies and seems to be more energetic when disparaging conservatives/Republicans than when talking about the fight against terrorism as Rush Limbaugh opined when he was a guest on Fox News Sunday, November 22, 2015.

Also, on 11/22/2015, I read an article on WND.com by Paul Bremmer that further disturbs me and furthers my opinion that the current president of the United States is evil.

According to a recent study by a team of Italian researchers, if you think there might be something wrong with homosexuality, you may have a mental disorder. Discussing the study, lead researcher Emmanuele A. Jannini stated: “After discussing for centuries if homosexuality is to be considered a disease, for the first time we demonstrated that the real disease to be cured is homophobia, associated with potentially severe psychopathologies.”

According to Mr. Bremmer, the research team specifically found that psychoticism, immature defense mechanisms, and a fearful attachment style were associated with a greater homophobic attitude in individuals.

Bremmer goes on to indicate that award winning journalist and author David Kupelian was not surprised by this new study because he predicted exactly such developments in his latest book, “The Snapping of the American Mind.”

Kupelina predicted that the current obsession of the looney left, which dominates the social sciences, with pathologizing conservatives and Christians as ‘disordered’ would only accelerate.

We all know that those on the left would welcome any study that indicated conservatives had a mental disorders by the fact that they are conservative. They would say that study was sound and irrefutable. Then in order to protect conservatives from themselves and protect liberals from conservatives, perhaps conservatives should be rounded up and required to undergo various methods of treatment that could include sensitivity training, medication, and perhaps incarceration.

Kupelina has also revealed in his book that some researchers have endeavored to prove conservatives’ brains are structured differently. A 2010 study in the United Kingdom reported conservatives’ brains with larger amygdalas, the part of the brain associated with fear, anxiety, and emotion. In 2012, a University of Arkansas professor released a study linking conservative views to low brainpower, writing, “When under time pressure or otherwise cognitively impaired, people are more likely to express conservative views.

However, Kupelian revealed that contrary to what liberal social scientists might prefer, solid research has shown that those on the political left are far more likely to suffer from mental illness than those on the right.

Mr. Kupelina opines that the Obama administration seems most concerned about protecting the rest of the country from conservatives. And while conservatives had not yet been declared mentally ill, but the Department of Homeland Security released a report in 2009 warning of a rising domestic terrorist threat from rightwing extremism. Rightwing extremists, according the report, included returning military vetrans, people concerned about illegal immigration, constitutionalists, second amendment supporters, and pro-lifers, among others.

The old Soviet Union, as well as other communist/far-left governments demonized their ideological opponents and would put them in gulags for torture and eventual execution. While I believe that this is a long way from happening in the United States of America and I think a revolt would occur long before any of this would ever happen here, the left certainly does everything it can to destroy those who don’t tow the liberal line. And to be able to commit conservatives to mental institutions, medicate them to the point of submission, and taking away their right to vote and bear arms, is certainly a liberal’s dream.

Facebooktwitter