Tag Archives: Michael Flynn

SABOTAGE OF DONALD TRUMP

In one of his monologues for his March 2, 2017 radio show, media mogul, Rush Limbaugh, stated that Barack Obama and his deep state operatives are attempting to sabotage the duly elected president of the United States.

Rush touched on everyone’s desire to defend Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, by pointing out Democrat hypocrisy. However, Rush rightly points out that there is no such thing as Democrat hypocrisy in the media. “You’re never going to beat these people back by pointing out how they’ve done the same thing that they’re accusing the Republicans of doing.

Rush further indicated that the story is not about Jeff Sessions, nor is it about illegal talks between Donald Trump and his campaign people with the Russians. Instead, the story is about Barack Obama and the Democrat Party attempting to sabotage the Trump presidency and do everything they can to render it meaningless and ineffective, or to get him impeached, or to force him to resign.

It seems as though the Republicans are on the defensive all of the time and there’s no reason for that because the Republicans won the election, taking the House and the Senate, and taking many state governorships and legislatures. Plus, there is no evidence of any illegal contact taking place between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

The only option that the Democrats have at their fingertips is to try to convince as many people as possible that Hillary should have won the election, that Trump is illegitimate, that Trump’s victory was the result of cheating, fake news, and maybe foreign espionage.

Upon close examination of the activities of the Democrats, it is obvious that they’re going after all of the people who are the closest advisers to President Trump. They took out Rudy Giuliani right after the election with stories about his supposed ties to foreign governments. Then they took out Michael Flynn by deciding to harp on the fact that Flynn had liked to Pence about something of tremendous, major import, forcing the President to get rid of Flynn on the basis that he’s not trustworthy.

Now, the left is going after AG, Jeff Sessions, stating that Sessions like to Al Franken during his Senate confirmation hearing. These are tactics and strategies of the Democrat party. The immediate knee-jerk reaction when these allegations surface is to accept their premise, and once we do that, we’re cooked.

Rush’s opinion as to what is driving this is the speech that President Trump made on Tuesday, February 28, 2017. The Democrats thought that Trump was going to continue to be what they consider a bumbling fool. Instead, they were treated to a great presidential speech, ratcheting up their intensity.

Rush indicated that Sessions, when asked about his conversations with the Russian ambassador, should have said, “Yeah, yeah, I talked to the Russian ambassador about our grandchildren.” That’s what I thought and I’m sure that many people thought that also. While we could have certainly pointed out the Clinton/Lynch meeting, things don’t work that way for Republicans. The Democrats are never held accountable for hypocrisy.

Thus, the Democrats are going after Sessions for the same reason they made Trump get rid of Michael Flynn. He’s not trustworthy. He like, etc. So, here come the calls from the Democrats: Impeachment! Special Prosecutor!

In conclusion, there is no evidence except the Obama administration and its holdovers in the deep state tried to sabotage the duly elected president of the United States. This is the story and this is what’s happening.

In calling for a special prosecutor, what is there to investigate? Allegations? Seriousness of the charge? The Democrats are trying to isolate Donald Trump from the people he trusts, trying to isolate him from the best people around him because they believe that Trump, without intelligence and guidance will fumble and stumble on his own because he doesn’t have a brain, nor political instincts, nor does he know what’s going on.

There’s a story out there about how Obama and his people are running a resistance operation from the former president’s Washington, D.C. home. Obama’s agenda has been totally rebuked by the American people. Now Obama is humiliated, angry, and embarrassed that his efforts to transform the United States of America into some sort of socialist paradise has been thwarted. Also, that Obama was the architect of the Democrat party defeat. That cannot be part of the history books. So, this story is all about the Democrat party trying to rewrite history and make it look like they actually won, except for the cheating of the Russians and Donald Trump.

In conclusion, Rush indicates that the Democrats are trying to convince the Europeans of this, plus, they’re doing everything they can to delegitimize President Trump, his administration, and his victory. Be that as it may, this is the story on which the American people need to focus.

Note from WNG: According to various news sources, newly confirmed Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Dr. Ben Carson, compared slavery to immigration in the United States, stating that there were other immigrants who came here on the bottom of slave ships, worked even longer, even harder for less. For this, he was immediately ridiculed by the left. Later, on the Armstrong Williams Show, Dr. Carson clarified his comments by stating that “slaves came here as involuntary immigrants, but they still had the strength to hold on.” Will the left except Dr. Carson’s clarification or will they continue to berate him as they have done to Michael Flynn and Jeff Sessions?

Facebooktwitter

WILFULL IGNORANCE

According to allenbwest.com, former head of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency under the current President, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said the administration’s foreign policy approach has led to an “almost a complete breakdown of order in the Middle East” and described it with two harsh words: “willful ignorance.”

Willful means intentional and ignorance means without knowledge. So, the current President approaches foreign policy related to the Middle East, as someone who just doesn’t want to know what’s taking place there.

On January 3, 2014, newspapers reported that the Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) had captured and raised its flag over Fallujah, where Marines in 2004 had fought one of the bloodiest battles of the Iraqi war. The Washington Post reported: “A rejuvenated al-Qadea-affiliated force asserted control over the western Iraqi city of Fallujah on Friday, raising its flag over government buildings and declaring an Islamic state in one of the most crucial areas that U.S. troops fought to pacify before withdrawing from Iraq over two years ago. The upheaval also affirmed the soaring capabilities of ISIS, the rebranded version of the al-Qaeda in Iraq organization that was formed a decade ago to confront U.S. troops and expanded into Syria last year while escalating its activities in Iraq.

The current President was asked where this was going now that al-Qaeda is resurgent in Iraq, Syria, and Africa by David Remnick of the New Yorker. His reply was as follows, “I think the analogy we user around here sometimes, and I think is accurate, is if a JV team puts on Lakers uniforms, that doesn’t make them Kobe Bryant. I think there is a distinction between the capacity and reach of a bin Laden and a network that is actively planning major terrorist plots against the homeland versus jihadists who are engaged in various local power struggles and disputes, often sectarian.”

Mr. Remnick then indicated to the current President that the JV team he was describing just took over Fallujah. The President then responded, “But let’s just keep in mind, Fallujah is a profoundly conservative Sunni city in a country that, independent of anything we do, is deeply divided along sectarian lines. And how we think about terrorism has to be defined and specific enough that it doesn’t lead us to think that any horrible actions that take place around the world that are motivated in part by an extremist Islamic ideology is a direct threat to us or something that we have to wade into.

In January 2014, the President viewed the situation in Iraq, particularly Fallujah as a local matter between jihadists, but now, the United States is striking ISIS targets in an effort to turn back its advance across Iraqi territory.

With the passage of time, the current President’s JV comment does look ignorant, so White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest is trying to cover up body odor with cheap perfume in suggesting that what is now known as the Islamic State was not the subject of the January 2014 conversation. In a Washington Post article, Glenn Kessler wrote that the context of Mr. Remnick’s question makes it clear that he was asking about ISIS.

The Middle East is a mess. In September 2014, the current President said that Yemen’s war on terror was a success. In January 2015, Shiite insurgents overran Yemen’s presidential palace, posing a coup-style threat to President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi. The U.S. was forced to close its embassy in Yemen and embassy personnel had to flee the country.

Now, the Secretary of State, under the direction of the current President has completed talks with Iran regarding their nuclear program. According to various news sources, only the framework of an agreement has been negotiated. I can’t imagine anyone in their right mind would think that Obama’s deal would keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons. But we all remember, “if you like your plan, you can keep your plan.” So I was expecting the current President to at least say that it’s a good plan and that we would have to read it to see what was in it.

However, the current President is now admitting the deal does no such thing according to caintv.com. Caintv.com goes on to indicate that even assuming Iran’s complete cooperation with all of the alleged terms, even assuming to cheating, even assuming they allow inspections when our side says they’re warranted, and even assuming no covert sites spinning centrifuges, we’re looking at a nuclear Iran probably sometime in the next decade.

The current President promised us that Iran would not have a nuclear weapon while he was President. It looks like the President has done just that. There may not be a nuclear weapon under his watch, but his watch ends in less than two years. What about the next President? Did the current President merely kick the can down the road? If Iran does get a nuclear weapon in ten months, will the drive-by media allow the President to blame Barack Obama like Barack Obama has blamed George Bush for the last six plus years? The Obama approach is to remove all threats of military action, remove all economic sanctions, trust Iran to keep its work, and then sign a deal that even he doesn’t claim keeps them from getting the bomb.

This makes me knot up inside. What is this President doing to the United States of America? Do we really think that Iran is going to cooperate with the terms of this agreement? They’re not! What scares me even more, though, is that this President is, at least, an admirer of Islam. Some folks out there say that he’s Islamic and that he bows to the east. I’m not going to say he’s Islamic; I’m just going to say that he is an admirer of Islam. On several occasion, he has said that he is a Christian.

According to wnd.com, at a White House breakfast, Tuesday morning, April 7, the current President took a swipe at Christians, saying Christians are supposed to love all their neighbors, but that he sometimes hears less than loving expressions by Christians. That concerns him. We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. I do it all the time. Humans are sinful by nature. Before stepping off into it, the President did “pull back.”
Now what about all the things that Muslims say about their neighbors and all the threats that Muslims make? He didn’t mention that.

I’ve always said and I will continue to say that this President’s goals are not to strengthen the United States of America and continue to strive for exceptionalism; rather the goals of this President are to destroy the United States of America and all that it stands for. Could this Iranian nuclear deal possibly have been negotiated so that Iran would deliberately put off developing and deploying nuclear weapons until this President is out of office, and then? Can you say “Willful Ignorance?”

Facebooktwitter