Tag Archives: homophobia

LIBERAL ADMISSION, THEY WON’T DEBATE

The following meme, from Liberal Identity, appeared on my Facebook newsfeed.

liberalIdentityPhoto

The creator of this meme indicated what he or she stood for as a liberal and even admitted to being one of those liberal elites.

There is one point, point eight, in which I agree. Safety nets are needed because we are a civilized country with our roots based on Judeo-Christian principles. As individuals, Jesus has instructed to help those who are less fortunate than we are. However, we should never become a nation that allows people to die in the streets from hunger, exposure, and/or disease. While I have been involved in debates between conservatives and liberals regarding just what kind of safety nets we should provide and can afford, I know of no conservative who is against any type of safety nets provided by the government.

Okay, fine, this liberal is admitting his or her beliefs and they are diametrically opposite to mine and to most who call themselves conservatives. Everyone has the right to their opinions and I’m certainly not going to belittle someone for expressing their views in the manner that the “tolerant” left does.

Eyeball down to the bottom of the meme where this liberal has indicated that he or she does not wish to debate these points, and that he or she will never change their view on these issues. Never say never, your views can change. While I’ve always leaned conservative, there was a time when I considered myself a moderate Republican. Not anymore, though.

It’s highly unusual, and many conservatives will back me up, to bring a liberal into a debate on the issues. They can’t win and they know it. So, instead, they hurl accusations of racism, homophobia, xenophobia, misogyny, and other stuff at you. They accuse you of hating the poor if you question the efficiency of an entitlement program. If you disagree with Barak Obama’s policies, you’re called a racist, even though you didn’t belittle the president because of his skin color. If you believe that marriage should be between one man and one woman, you’re a homophobe. If you believe in school choice and question anything related to the public schools and public school teachers, you are against education and hate teachers.

I used to think it was something about me that made liberals want to hurl insults at me. I soon, though, realized that it wasn’t me. Everyone who attempts to have a debate with a liberal on the issues has insults hurled at them. Many conservatives give up, and that’s unfortunate.

The “tolerant” left needs to be reminded constantly that there are different viewpoints out there. They also need to be reminded that debate, including freedom of speech and freedom of expression are rights of citizenship bestowed upon us by our creator and solidified in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. Plus, the worse the names they can call you, the more classless they appear.

I’ve expressed my angst regarding liberals’ refusal to debate the issues, and preferring to make themselves even more unattractive with their insults. I started using the phrase, “tolerant” left months ago, being sarcastic, of course. Since I started using it in my writings, I have heard Bill O’Reilly use it a time or two. I wonder which one of us coined it first.

We didn’t learn anything new about liberals today. Instead, we now have it from the “horse’s mouth.” Liberals are admitting that they refuse to respect differing points of view, much less debate their points of view. It’s their way or the highway. Furthermore, they have indicated they prefer to live in a totalitarian state.

According to dictionary.com, liberal means the following:

  • Favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
  • Noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
  • Of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism, especially the freedom of the individual and governmental guarantees of individual rights and liberties.
  • Favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
  • Favoring of permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief of expression.

Liberals, you certainly don’t favor any of the above concepts. In fact, under your own liberal admission, you are certainly not advocates of progressive political reform. Your philosophy dates back to when the planet consisted of kingdoms, ruled by kings, chosen by divine right.

Maybe you need to change what you call yourselves.

Facebooktwitter

DISTURBING THINGS

The Paris attacks of November 13, 2015, of which ISIS has claimed credit, seem to have unleashed many disturbing things. The current president’s response to these attacks is unprecedented for any past leader of the free world. He has done nothing to insure the American people that he intends to carry out the oath he has taken twice where he swore to uphold the constitution of the United States of America, therefore, protect the Unites States and its citizens from harm. I’ve never commented on this, but I’m going to now. I am convinced that the president of the United States is either a Muslim or a strong Muslim sympathizer. There’s just too much evidence point the above. Every chance he has, he disses Christianity and tells us that we shouldn’t judge the Islam by the actions of a few. However, he has indicated that all conservatives/Republicans are his enemies and seems to be more energetic when disparaging conservatives/Republicans than when talking about the fight against terrorism as Rush Limbaugh opined when he was a guest on Fox News Sunday, November 22, 2015.

Also, on 11/22/2015, I read an article on WND.com by Paul Bremmer that further disturbs me and furthers my opinion that the current president of the United States is evil.

According to a recent study by a team of Italian researchers, if you think there might be something wrong with homosexuality, you may have a mental disorder. Discussing the study, lead researcher Emmanuele A. Jannini stated: “After discussing for centuries if homosexuality is to be considered a disease, for the first time we demonstrated that the real disease to be cured is homophobia, associated with potentially severe psychopathologies.”

According to Mr. Bremmer, the research team specifically found that psychoticism, immature defense mechanisms, and a fearful attachment style were associated with a greater homophobic attitude in individuals.

Bremmer goes on to indicate that award winning journalist and author David Kupelian was not surprised by this new study because he predicted exactly such developments in his latest book, “The Snapping of the American Mind.”

Kupelina predicted that the current obsession of the looney left, which dominates the social sciences, with pathologizing conservatives and Christians as ‘disordered’ would only accelerate.

We all know that those on the left would welcome any study that indicated conservatives had a mental disorders by the fact that they are conservative. They would say that study was sound and irrefutable. Then in order to protect conservatives from themselves and protect liberals from conservatives, perhaps conservatives should be rounded up and required to undergo various methods of treatment that could include sensitivity training, medication, and perhaps incarceration.

Kupelina has also revealed in his book that some researchers have endeavored to prove conservatives’ brains are structured differently. A 2010 study in the United Kingdom reported conservatives’ brains with larger amygdalas, the part of the brain associated with fear, anxiety, and emotion. In 2012, a University of Arkansas professor released a study linking conservative views to low brainpower, writing, “When under time pressure or otherwise cognitively impaired, people are more likely to express conservative views.

However, Kupelian revealed that contrary to what liberal social scientists might prefer, solid research has shown that those on the political left are far more likely to suffer from mental illness than those on the right.

Mr. Kupelina opines that the Obama administration seems most concerned about protecting the rest of the country from conservatives. And while conservatives had not yet been declared mentally ill, but the Department of Homeland Security released a report in 2009 warning of a rising domestic terrorist threat from rightwing extremism. Rightwing extremists, according the report, included returning military vetrans, people concerned about illegal immigration, constitutionalists, second amendment supporters, and pro-lifers, among others.

The old Soviet Union, as well as other communist/far-left governments demonized their ideological opponents and would put them in gulags for torture and eventual execution. While I believe that this is a long way from happening in the United States of America and I think a revolt would occur long before any of this would ever happen here, the left certainly does everything it can to destroy those who don’t tow the liberal line. And to be able to commit conservatives to mental institutions, medicate them to the point of submission, and taking away their right to vote and bear arms, is certainly a liberal’s dream.

Facebooktwitter