Tag Archives: Hillary Clinton

ARE FEMINISTS DESTROYING WOMEN?

With the many recent revelations by women who are alleging to have suffered sexual assault and abuse by various men, most of them famous in some way or the other, I’m getting the feeling that men are getting scared, and may become hesitant to have lunch, coffee, dinner, or meet in an office alone with any woman, even if that woman has been a valued colleague of theirs for years.

Vice President, Mike Pence, has indicated that he will not have lunch, dinner, or meet with a woman unless his wife is present. While that is certainly admiral, I think it’s carrying things a little too far. I had a job for over fifteen years where I worked and traveled mostly with men. I frequently had lunch and dinner with colleagues, met with them alone, and have even met with them in hotel rooms. All of these associates were consummate professionals and nothing out of the ordinary took place and wasn’t even thinkable.

With all the women who are trotting out and getting their fifteen minutes of fame, I believe that some are legitimate, but I also believe that some may be lying through their teeth. In the case of Judge Roy Moore, candidate for U.S. Senator from Alabama, some women are only alleging that he asked them out when they were in their teens and he was in his early thirties. The act of asking a young woman out on a date is not a crime, nor does it constitute sexual abuse. But once the woman comes out and speaks, feminists began screaming that the so-called victim deserves to be believed, and the man should be demonized for life. As in the cases of Michael Brown and the Duke University Lacrosse team, the alleged assailants are guilty, and the victims are innocent. Even if facts and investigations prove otherwise at later dates, the men’s lives are ruined anyway.

If I’m a working man with a family whose job it is to regularly interact with others in my field, both men and women, should I be concerned that some woman, a subordinate, a colleague, or even a boss may decide that they want to make trouble for me, and allege that I behaved inappropriately when alone with them? Maybe. It’s certainly something to think about.

If men are apprehensive about being around women because they fear being accused of inappropriate behavior, what’s this going to do to the progress women have made since the early seventies when it became commonplace for women to be hired to perform jobs that had traditionally been held by men? If a woman and a man are the top two candidates for a job such as the one I had for years, would the person in charge of hiring, to be on the safe side, opt to hire the man? What about promotions. Is this going to hurt qualified women’s chances of getting well-deserved promotions?

Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, many big decisions and strategies are made over lunch, dinner, coffee, and even drinks late at night in a bar.  If restrictions are put on these types of meetings, less is going to get done. Sure, guidelines can be implemented. But isn’t this just adding more layers of bureaucracy and more layers of stress?

From the day after President Trump’s inauguration, radical feminists have fought everything he and his administration have done, and are continuing to do so. They thought they were cute dressing up as women’s body parts and wearing the so-called vagina hats. But all they were doing were embarrassing themselves and, embarrassing the good and decent hard-working women out there who want to have the same opportunities as men, and compete for the same jobs as men, but don’t want to destroy men, our fathers, our brothers, our cousins, our nephews, our uncles, our sons, our husbands, and our boyfriends.

Furthermore, these feminists, including the queen of them all, Hillary Clinton, not only want to destroy men, particularly men who are white, Christian, and conservative, they also want to destroy the women who don’t see eye to eye with them. Women who didn’t support Hillary Clinton are of course, deplorables, but we are also problematic and a disgrace to our gender.

Several years ago, young black conservative, Jason Riley authored a book directed at the left entitled, “Please stop helping us.” He’s asking the liberal establishment to please stop helping blacks and describes how the liberal establishment has actually hurt blacks, not helped them.

Could the same thing be happening to women, could the radical feminists possibly destroy all the progress for which women have worked so hard? I believe that’s possible. So, to you, radical feminists, please stop helping us. You nothing but problematic and a disgrace to my gender.

Facebooktwitter

UNIMAGINABLE LIBERAL LUNACY

To my readers and followers, I’m writing this on the morning of May 17, 2017 after revelations by the liberal media that: (1) President Trump leaked classified information to the Russians, and (2) President Trump told former FB I Director James Comey that he hoped Comey could end the investigation into former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn soon.

I’ve written much about liberal lunacy, but never in my lifetime have I seen a crazier bunch of people and crazier actions that what I’ve witnessed from the Democrats/liberals/progressives or whatever they want to call themselves these days.

With respect to number two above, according to the New York Times, President Trump’s exact words were: “I hope you can let things go.” With respect to number one above, National Security Advisor, H.R. McMaster, who participated in the meeting, has said, “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”

Comey Memo Says Trump Asked Him to End Flynn Investigation

Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador

The purpose of this article is not to elaborate about the above and the unfounded allegations by the left that President Trump somehow colluded with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. Instead, as a political conservative writer, the left has made my head spin with all their talk of obstruction of justice, national security breaches, and possible impeachment…unimaginable liberal lunacy.

Since late yesterday afternoon (May 16, 2017), I’ve heard the word “impeach” thrown out loosely by those in the media, including Fox News which normally is respectful of conservatives and the conservative point of view. This takes me back to the Clinton presidency when George Stephanopoulos, and ABC news anchor, on the ABC News’ Sunday morning show, “This Week,” uttered the “I” word. People, especially liberals that the former Clinton advisor would say such a word. Now we’re seeing it thrown around with reckless abandon within the last twenty-four hours.

While the left continuously attempted to damage Donald Trump and his family during the campaign for president, the American people have never witnessed anything like the constant bombardment of the Trump administration by the left through the acts of lying, hating, injuring, and property destruction…unimaginable liberal lunacy.

There were rumors going around and maybe some of them were verified, that Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell stated, not in a public forum, that he and certain Republicans were going to do everything in their power to derail the Obama presidency. The liberals “quaked and shaked” over this calling anyone who would not assimilate to the former president’s policies a racist. But no sooner had the main talking head of every major media outlet announced that Donald Trump had been elected president, the left immediately let everyone know (via the public forum) that they were going to fight tooth and nail against anything the new administration attempted to do. The word, “Resist,” was used from the moment Trump was declared President Elect. It was posted on banners everywhere the left protested. The libs even reminded the rest of us that it was patriotic to dissent and dissent was what they were going to do, never mind that dissent during the Obama administration was considered racist by the left. Even Hillary has gotten on the “Resist” bandwagon by extending the slogan to “Resist, Insist, and Persist.”

Since the inauguration of Donald Trump, and the bombardment from the left has ratcheted up several notches, I’ve told myself repeatedly to get used to it. It’s an established fact that liberals are hypocrites, and don’t care if they are labeled hypocrites. It’s becoming increasingly evident that they not only embellish, but they “out and out” lie, making up their lies out of nowhere. While I have maintained for years that liberals are the real haters, even though they have consistently accused conservatives of being haters. I think everyone is agreement, even the liberals, that they are all-consumed with hate for anyone who does not agree with them politically.

After observing the last four months, and especially the last few days, I have no other choice than to conclude that liberals are “genuine, certified loons.” The lunacy displayed by the left is unimaginable, and while I knew there would be difficulties created by the lunatic liberals in their fight against anything Donald Trump would attempt to do as President of the United States, I never envisioned what is taking place today and will surely continue to take place tomorrow, the next day, and the next.

Having said the above about liberals, I may have some decisions to make soon. Should I disassociate with anyone who is a Democrat/liberal/progressive? No liberal who I know personally or through social media has disavowed the lies, the selective hatred, the destruction of person property, nor the inflicting of bodily injury that have become common, condoned actions of the left. I have chosen to cease being friends with one person who has consistently used social media to spread lies about Donald Trump and his supporters, including those of us who didn’t support Obama. There are more out there. Will I chose to drop friends and associates? I don’t know, but it pains me to think about it. Liberals destroy everything they touch.

Facebooktwitter

LIBERALS HAVE THE MATURITY OF HIGH SCHOOL SOPHOMORES

Think back to your high school days, those days where the “cool crowd” ruled. The “cool crowd” consisted mostly of the athletes, beauty queens, the talented, those whose parents had money, and yes, maybe those who were extremely smart. Those not in the “cool crowd” were the students who were not the very talented, not the very beautiful, not the very athletic, etc. Even the teachers favored the students who were part of the “cool crowd,” often taking an interest in the top two or three in the class, to the detriment of the remainder of the other students. The students who were part of the “cool crowd” often mistreated those students were not a part of the “cool crowd,” often to the point of hurting them so much that they experienced difficulties later in life. I shouldn’t have to further illustrate this because you surely get my drift.

My high school graduating class currently has socials once a quarter. At a recent reunion, it was suggested by one of the class leaders that we put our petty issues behind us and go forward as a class and be there for one another. In a recent email, another class leader acknowledged that for some classmates, high school was not a pleasant experience, but urged those folks who may not have warm fuzzy feeling about their high school days to come back and be a part of the class.

Today’s liberals, even though they are well into adulthood, still have the maturity of high school sophomores. They think of themselves as the “cool crowd,” and often mistreat anyone who doesn’t have the same political philosophy as they do. I was purposefully not invited to a cousin’s wedding because of my political ideology. I have an alleged friend who entertains a lot, mostly dinner parties for her little clique. She’s a liberal and has never invited me to one of her little soirees because I’m a conservative and might embarrass her in front of her elitist friends. I also suspect that I was left out of an Aunt’s will because of my political philosophy. And if you’re wondering, I do have a few liberals in my family.

Liberals are nothing but bullies. As we all know, they don’t hesitate to call anyone who doesn’t agree with them names such as moron, idiot, clueless, dumb, mentally retarded (even though that term is not politically correct, except when it pertains to conservatives), etc.

Even though central Alabama is one of the major conservative strongholds, we do have liberals. And those liberals are likely to be nasty, hateful people, because they are in the minority, and they know it. But that doesn’t keep these liberals from acting like high school sophomores.

A guy who was a year ahead of me in high school requested friendship from me back in 2010. He was and still is very brilliant, and was one of those students who the teachers favored. Because he was a strong liberal, he, his liberal friends, and I often got into serious political discussions. Like all liberals, he is full of hate and abhors all who do not agree with him politically. After Donald Trump received the Republican nomination for president, this FB friend indicated that he would unfriend anyone who was a Trump supporter because of his hatred for Trump and Trump supporters. After indicating that I was a Trump supporter, he promptly unfriended me. If I were to ever meet up with this person face to face, I have no doubt he would be the same snooty elitist person toward me now as he was to me in high school, even though I was one of the smart, talented, and pretty students in my high school.

Another guy who was in my graduating class and one of the smart, elitist, teacher favorites in high school is now a big liberal and an educator in one of the liberal strongholds of the United States. Even though I was never FB friends with him, he was one of those who indicated that anyone who didn’t support the policies of Barack Obama was a racist. He was one of those folks who felt that all white people were born racist and because of that should give themselves lashes with a whip (well maybe not a whip, maybe a fly swatter) every night before going to sleep to atone for their racist indwelling. He and I had a back and forth on a mutual friend’s thread. In the end, I sent him a private message telling him just what I thought about him and his elitist self. I even went back to our high school days. Needless to say, he never responded back to me.

Does it sound like these individuals who I have discussed above never matured past high school? Or maybe you might say, well, these are examples of only a few of “not so nice” people, but not all liberals are like this. Wrong. That’s not what I’ve observed over the years that I’ve been observing the behavior of the left.

Look around. Get on liberal Internet forums and discussion threads. It’s not illegal to do that; nor is it illegal to make comments on these threads. It is very rare to find a liberal thread where four-letter words are not used on a regular basis. Donald Trump, Mike Pence, Jeff Sessions, Kellyanne Conway, and other administration officials and prominent Republicans are constantly trashed and called and accused of unspeakable things. Issues are never discussed, just all-out mud-slinging takes place on these forums. Calling people names, especially with regard to their looks and their actions? Sure sounds sophomoric to me.

And this failure by liberals to get over Hillary Clinton’s loss in her bid for the presidency is, perhaps, the most glaring example of the immature left. This reminds me of high school beauty pageants, particularly mine. With few exceptions, the winner was generally a surprise contestant. Judges for the pageant almost always lived outside the area; and thus, had no idea regarding the popularity of the young ladies competing for the crown. However, there were always two or three girls who were the favorites. One year, in my high school’s beauty pageant, a relatively unknown young woman was crowned, while one of the favorites, in a rage, attempted to storm off the stage when the winner was announced. Luckily the loser was corralled before it became obvious to the audience what was taking place. Spoiled and immature? Yep! The loser acted then just like liberals are acting now. There is one difference, though. The young lady who lost, like the rest of us, eventually grew up. The Hillary supports are adults who give the appearance of never having grown up.

Liberals are the true racists, bigots, hypocrites, liars, and haters. They don’t seem capable of discussing the issues. Instead, they resort to their name-calling, their hate, and their venom-spewing. Like the members of the “cool crowds,” common to all high schools, they think they can do anything and get by with it because they’re smart, beautiful, athletic, and talented. The teacher loved maybe the top five of them and couldn’t care less about the other students. So, they were allowed to get by with being snobby, often making the lives of other students miserable to the point that these students suffered difficulties later in life. However, what do they care?

Liberals don’t care about anything except themselves and controlling the lives of everyone else. They certainly don’t care about anyone’s happiness or well-being, unless, of course, you carry water for their leftist/socialist/communist agenda.
Liberals have only the maturity of high school students, and I don’t look for that to change anytime soon.

Facebooktwitter

BACK TO MISOGYNY

My article for this blog, dated 4/10/2017, was entitled, “Back to Racism.” The article outlined another article written by Mehdi Hasan for theintercept.com, entitled, Top Democrats are Wrong: Trump Supporters were more Motivated by Racism than Economic issues. See my article, Back to Racism, April 10, 2017.

Dated April 11, 2017, in an article entitled, Bozell & Graham Column: Hillary Blames Self-Hating Women for her Loss, from newsbusters.org, Brent Bozell and Tim Graham (no relation, to my knowledge) review who Hillary Clinton is holding responsible for her loss in the 2016 presidential election.

According to Bozell and Graham, Hillary Clinton granted her first interview since losing the election on April 6, 2017. The interview took place at the “Women in the World” conference, organized by leftist editor Tina Brown. When the former Secretary of State was introduced by comedian, Samantha Bee, on cue, Ms. Bee genuflected, “You deserve to hear it 100 times, it should have been you.”

Bozell and Graham went on to indicated that the assignment to interview Mrs. Clinton fell to New York Times columnist, Nicholas Kristof. He later wrote a column on his Hillary chat, beginning in the most wrenching, humiliating way possible, Hillary Clinton has been liberated. She is now out of the woods again and speaking her mind.

In fact, the entire leftist population should be humiliated that Hillary, the anointed one, as told to us by the press, lost to Donald Trump, an unenlightened oaf. Mrs. Clinton was one of the most qualified candidates to be president as this nation has ever had.

The feminists at this conference and I would suspect that all of the conference attendees would call themselves feminists, reallywant to know why Americans hate women so deeply, and what is wrong with those self-hating white Republican women.

One of the questions Kristof lobbed at Clinton went like this: “This is a women’s empowerment conference, so I have to ask. Fundamentally, a man who bragged about sexual assault won the election, and with 53 percent of the white women’s vote. How is that, in the 21st century, what does it say about the challenges that one faces in women’s empowerment, that in effect, misogyny won with a lot of women voters?

According to the Newsbusters’ article, Hillary loved this softball question and replied, “Certainly, misogyny played a role. This just has to be admitted.” She and Kristof mulled over what he called “abundant social science research” that we admire men for being ambitious and successful, but find women “less likeable” when they are powerful.

Bozell and Graham state that it has been five months since the election, and the best analysis these people can muster sounds exactly the last weekend of the campaign when Barack Obama told the American people, “Don’t be a sexist. I want you to think about it because she is so much better qualified than the other guy. She has conducted herself so much better in public life than the other guy.”

It is certain no conversation took place between Kristof and the former presidential candidate regarding her husband, the former President of the United States, Bill Clinton’s “targeting of women.” Hillary never allows an interviewer to ask her about her role leading the “Bimbo-Bashing Patrol” to destroy the reputations of her husband’s victims.

Back to what Kristof calls, “abundant social science research.” So, ambitious and successful women are less likeable than their male counterparts? That may have been true in the mid-1970s when it was just becoming fashionable for women to seek careers in what were previously considered “male-only” or “almost male-only” fields. Women often had to take on a more “hardened” facade to get attention and convince her bosses and colleagues that she was indeed worthy of the position.

Fast-forward to the last half of the second decade of the twenty-first century. The hurdles are cleared, the mountains are reduced to rolling hills, the awkwardness has been worked through. Yes, there are still incidents of inequity, but as things have certainly improved since the mid-1970s, they will continue to improve. Nothing is ever going to be perfect, though, until Jesus returns to earth and sets up his 1000-year kingdom.

When women began making headway in the workplace, older male baby boomers, male pre-baby boomers, and World War II generation males still mostly dominated. Many of these men did have a hard time accepting women. They began their careers in male-dominated environments and then suddenly there’s an influx of women, and minorities also. They assumed they would never have to complete with anyone except white males. Many were resentful and were difficult on the women, and the minorities.

Many of those white males are now dead, and the older baby boomers are retiring. In a few years, there will be very few of these men in the workforce. The men who remain will all have begun their careers working with and competing with women. The same is true about minorities. Your forty-five-year-old middle management guy entered the workforce the early to mid-1990s. Sandra Day O’Connor was a Supreme Court Justice, Geraldine Ferraro  made an unsuccessful run for Vice President on the ticket with Walter Mondale, Madeline Albright was Secretary of State, Carol Mosely Braun, a black woman, was elected Senator from Illinois, Jeanne Kirkpatrick was the USA’s Ambassador to the United Nations, and Madeline Albright was the USA’s Ambassador to the United Nations and became Secretary of State in 1997.

I am not buying what Hillary and Kristof are pushing. I will never believe it was misogyny that resulted in Hillary Clinton, the first female nominated by a major political party for president of the United States, losing her bid. Stances on the issues played a major part. While a majority of Americans liked former President, Barack Obama, they did not like the direction in which the country was moving and were not onboard with many of his policies, plus Obama’s economy remained sluggish throughout his presidency. Also, Republican candidate, Donald Trump, a pure businessman, saw regions in traditionally Democrat states where there was substantial dissatisfaction among workers, many of which had lost their jobs after the 2008 crash and were struggling to find work. Candidate Trump went after these voters and convinced them to cast their ballots for him, and they did.

Clinton supporters and still whining about her lost and can’t come to terms with it five months after the election. They’re to be pitied.

Facebooktwitter

BACK TO RACISM

President Donald Trump was elected President of the United States five months ago. He was inaugurated as the 45th President of the United States two and a half months ago. Yet, Democrats still can’t decide why their candidate, Hillary Roddam Clinton, wife of former president, beloved by all Democrats, Bill Clinton, lost.

During the presidential campaign, we heard all sorts of allegations of sexism, or the trendier term, misogyny, against those who did not support the Democrat nominee. Of course, for the eight previous years of Obama, we heard nothing but racism allegations against those who were not supportive of the 44th President of the United States. So, first it is racism for which the right is guilty, then enters candidate Clinton, and it is sexism for which the right is guilty.

I have said this before, and I will say it again. Does anybody focus on issues? It is evident that the Democrats are not focused on issues. Some of them do have enough smarts to know they cannot win on issues, but the rest of the Democrats are too ignorant to focus on the issues. So, there we go. I have called Democrats ignorant, and I am not taking it back. They are ignorant. Notice, I said ignorant, not stupid. If you do not know the difference, look it up in Webster’s.

An article came across my news feed from theintercept.com, a website with which I was not familiar, entitled: Top Democrats are Wrong: Trump Supporters were more Motivated by Racism than Economic Issues. Truth be known, I was not aware that Democrats were even entertaining the idea that their beloved Hillary Clinton lost the President election except for us racist, sexist Republicans.

According to the author of the article, Mehdi Hasan, Bernie Sanders, de facto leader of the Resistance stated, “Some people think that those who voted for Trump are racists, sexists, homophobes and deplorable folks.”

This statement was made at a rally in Boston, alongside socialist/communist Senator, Elizabeth Warren. Can’t believe that Fauxkahontas was silent on this one. Mr. Hasan does not agree with Senators Sanders and Fauxkahontas, I mean Warren. Hasan further indicates that, in the New York Times, three days after the November election, the Vermont Senator claimed that Trump voters were “expressing their fierce opposition to an economic and political system that puts wealthy and corporate interests over their own.”

Mr. Hasan feels that both Sanders and Fauxkahontas, I mean Warren, seem much keener to lay the blame at the feet of the dysfunctional Democratic Party and an ailing economy than at the feet of racist Republican voters. Hasan goes on to state that their deflection is not surprising, nor is their coddling of those who happily embraced an openly xenophobic candidate.

In his article, Hasan says that “He gets it,” and agrees that it is hard to accept that millions of their fellow citizens harbor what political scientists have identified as “racial resentment.” (I have not heard that term before.) He further acknowledges that the reluctance to admit that bigotry, and tolerance of bigotry, is still widespread in society is understandable. Hasan then asks the question, why would senior members of the Democratic leadership want to alienate millions of voters by dismissing them as racist bigots?

What did I get from the above? Some Democrats may be willing to justify Hillary Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump because Democrats are out of touch with middle-class America. With respect to the issues, including the economy, foreign policy, immigration, energy, the environment, and health care, Democrats are diametrically opposite to mainstream America, also known as the fly-over country. However, that is a mighty big but, other Democrats are continuing to hurl accusations of racism, sexism, and whatever else they can throw at those who disagree with them.

I was one of the first pundits to label Democrats/ liberals/progressives or whatever they want to call themselves these days as the “tolerant left.” I am sarcastic. The left is anything but open-minded and tolerant. Later Bill O’Reilly also used that term. Maybe I should have had it copyrighted.

As I have indicated in many of my writings, liberals are the real racists, hypocrites, liars, and bigots. If some left-winger hurls the racism accusation at me, I know that I have won the debate, the argument, or whatever. Liberals change the definition or racism to whatever suits their needs of the moment. If they cannot justify the hurling of other accusations at someone with whom they do not agree, they will resort to racism.

Hasan cites American National Election data and a “plethora” of studies that have concluded that since the start of the 2016 presidential campaign that the race was about race. Philip Klinkner, a political scientist at Hamilton College, and an expert on race relations (that’s what the article said), grabbed headlines last summer when he revealed that the best way to identify a Trump supporter was to ask that person if Obama was a Muslim.  If the person said yes and the person was white, 89% of the time that person would have a higher opinion of Trump than Clinton. So, anyone who thinks Obama is a Muslim and has white skin, probably a racist.

Wow! That’s what I call scientific.

Hasan also indicated that other surveys and polls of Trump voters found “a strong relationship between anti-black attitudes and support for Trump,” with rump supporters being more likely to describe African Americans as criminal, unintelligent, lazy, and violent. Also, Trump voters were most likely to believe that people of color are taking white jobs, and a majority of them rate blacks as less evolved than whites.

My regular readers know that I am from the state of Alabama and currently live in the Birmingham area. Yes, Birmingham, Alabama. I do not hear or observe any of the attitudes or statements that Mr. Hasan makes in the above paragraphs in this, the second half of the second decade of the twenty-first century. These attitudes may have been common in the late sixties/early to mid-seventies. But not now. Alternatively yet, maybe folks up north have these attitudes, but not here in the south.

Because Trump managed to win white votes regardless of age, gender, income, or education, racial identity and attitudes displaced class as the central battleground of American politics as Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have espoused.

Hasan does cover the question, “how can racial resentment have motivated Trump supporters when so many of them voted for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012?” Klinkner covers that by stating that in 2016, Clinton, unlike Obama, faced a Republican candidate who pushed the buttons of race and nativism in open and explicit ways that John McCain and Mitt Romney were unwilling or unable to do. Did he? I followed the campaign closely, and it did not appear to me that Donald Trump was “pushing buttons of race and nativism in open and explicit ways.” The comments made about Mexicans who crossed the border illegally being criminals and rapists did not appear racist to me, nor did it to most conservatives. Liberals, of course, went ballistic, but what else is new?

So, based on the above notions, which are abstract at best, Mr. Hasan, concludes: “It isn’t the economy. It’s the racism, stupid.” But wait…is Mrs. Clinton not a white woman? Yes, Mrs. Clinton is indeed a white woman, who campaigned on continuing the policies of Barack Obama. So, if the voters, who overwhelmingly voted for Barack Obama were pleased with the direction in which the country was heading, but just did not like Obama because of the color of his skin, they should be ecstatic that someone white was running and was promising to continue Obama-style governance.

Mr. Hasan’s reasoning is substantially flawed. Plus, these studies, which he sites sound bogus to me. Remember, though, Mr. Hasan is a liberal, and liberals do not have to be correct. They just have to say something over and over again until the fact that what they are saying is a lie no longer matters. It is now the truth. Liberals no longer have to be consistent. Being hypocritical is accepted in liberal land.

Are liberals ever going to stop hurling false accusations and those who do not agree with them? We all know the answer to that one. Are we ever going to get liberals to change? Of course not! Then why bother? Because we must continue to stand up for what is right. Standing down and letting the left continue to spout forth their lies and hypocrisies, allows them to win in the end.

Facebooktwitter