Tag Archives: Barack Obama

MORE ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACY IN THE UNITED STATES

Rush Limbaugh does it, Sean Hannity does it, Tucker Carlson does it, Bill O’Reilly does it and most every conservative pundit and talking head does it. What do they do? Before beginning a discussion on the recent demonstrations and protests such as Charlottesville, Boston, and Berkley, all folks participating in the discussion must first denounce white supremacy, white nationalism, neo-Nazism. For to not do so, would signal to the left in this country that you are not only a hater, but a white supremacy/white nationalist/neo-nazi yourself.  And once the left labels you as such, lack of evidence notwithstanding, you’re done.

As I indicated in my August 16 article, entitled, “Condemn the white groups first, forget the rest,” the citizens of the United States of America have been conditioned by the left that racism by whites or white groups, particularly white nationalists/white supremacists if the sin that can possible be committed on the planet, and anyone found guilty of this sin must die.

If a white nationalist group and a left wing radical group such as Antifa which has its roots in the old Occupy Wall Street movement and is a communist based organization, collide, you sure can’t blame both sides and let it go at that. You must first denounce the white supremacists/white nationalists/neo-Nazis as the biggest threat this country faces, forget about Kim Jung Un and a nuclear Korea, or the Islamic terrorist state of Iran and their continued violations of the treaty former President, Barack Obama made with them.

I also mentioned in my previous article that I had heard some talking head indicating that the number of white supremacists/white nationalists/neo-Nazis in this country numbered about 100,000. Plus, if there are regular cross-burnings and lynchings taking place in the country, I haven’t heard about it, and I live in central Alabama, the Birmingham area, to be exact. Furthermore, I’m not hearing of any Jewish people being rounded up and sent to concentration camps, have you? If cross burnings, lynchings, and the imprisonment of Jews are common place in this country, wouldn’t CNN, MSNBC, or other left-leaning media outlets be broadcasting it instead of Russia, Russia, Russia, and first lady, Melania Trump’s choice of shoes?

My point is that I don’t see these white supremacist/white nationalist/neo-Nazi groups as that prevalent or dangerous. Could they become dangerous and a threat to Americans? I’m sure, if provoked enough, they could. But right now, Antifa, the MS-13 gangs, and even Black Lives Matter are a bigger domestic threat to Americans than any of the various white supremacist/white nationalist/neo-Nazi groups. And let’s not forget ISIS or also known as the Islamic State, which had its origins in the vacuum created in Iraq when former President Barack Obama pulled troops out of that country. To date, ISIS is the evilest terrorist group on the planet, and they have a presence in the United States. Also worth mention are the Taliban, the Muslim Brotherhood (a favorite of former President Barack Obama), and Al Qaeda.

While we are all familiar with the Black Panthers, Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, and now MS-13 and Antifa, before the Charlottesville melee and “Unite the Right,” except for the Ku Klux Klan, I couldn’t name any individual white supremacist groups. Once again, they are just not that prevalent and practically no incidents of a national news level can be contributed to these groups.

We have recently discovered that the son of Vice Presidential nominee, Tim Kaine, is a member of Antifa, and was arrested at the Minnesota State Capitol in March after disrupting a pro-Trump rally (According to Gateway Pundit). Children, even raised in the best of homes often go astray as did young Linwood Kaine. But, can you imagine if it had been discovered that the son or daughter of a prominent Republican was participating in a so-called White Nationalist group. CNN, MSNBC, and other MSM outlets would have a field day. Most likely, half of their time would be spent on “Russia, Russia, Russia, and the other half spent on the Republican’s son or daughter. And this would take place after the prominent Republican condemned, condemned, and condemned the actions of his offspring. To date, I am not aware That Tim Kaine has condemned the behavior of his son.

It’s hard to find statistics on White Nationalist groups. Cursory Google searches virtually turn up nothing. While searches for statistics on international terrorism, including acts committed on U.S. soil by individuals linked to foreign terrorist organizations, yields a gold mine, according to Sarah Tate Chambers in an August 17, 2017 article in lawfareblog.com. In Search of Data on White Supremacist Violent Crime.

Left wing smear merchant, Slate.com, in an article entitled “The Long List of Killings Committed by White Extremists Since the Oklahoma City Bombing,” published on August 14, 2017, tells us that in the two decades since Timothy McVeigh’s attack killing 168 in Oklahoma City, the Southern Poverty Law Center has created a list of thirty-five deadly attacks, rending 74 victims, carried or believed to be carried out by white extremists. You can read the list for yourself. The Long List of Killings Committed by White Extremists Since the Oklahoma City Bombing.  Key words here are “carried or believed to be carried out.” We don’t know if all of these killings were white supremacist based. Furthermore, these are single incidents carried by either one person or only a few people It’s not surprise that Slate pontificates on how egregious this is, thirty-five attacks in twenty years. I wonder if Slate has ever written about the bloodshed in the south side of Chicago that occurs on a nightly basis where scores of black lives have been taken and continue to be taken.

In an article on revealnews.org, a piece was written outlining an interview Reveal’s host, Al Letson had with known and admitted White Nationalist, Richard Spencer. Of course, to the left, Spencer is Adolph Hitler incarnate. Without dissecting the article, my take is that Richard Spencer indeed believes that those of white European descent are superior to those who are not. He doesn’t believe in the mixing of the races and believes that the so-called mixing has not worked well. Thus, he claims to have a long-term dream of an “ethnostate,” a territory set aside for people of European descent.

The piece on Reveal links to another article on Mother Jones, another far left smear merchant site. Among other things, the article in Mother Jones indicates that Spencer envisions a future for the United States along the lines of a “renewed Roman Empire,” a dictatorship where the main criteria for citizenship would be whiteness. Meet the White Nationalist Trying to Ride the Trump Train to Lasting Power.

While this Mother Jones article is replete with lies and half-truths, particularly about President Trump, the writing does not paint Richard Spencer as a violent or otherwise dangerous person. And if he were, I have no doubt that Mother Jones would get that in there somehow, or perhaps devote the entire piece to it. If he walked into a restaurant where I was dining, would I be scared that he would pull out a gun and start shooting? No. Would I want him seated at a table or booth next to me? No, again. If I were a non-white, how would I feel. I can’t answer that because I am white. But I think I would feel much the same way. Spencer has extreme weird philosophies that are not shared by most Americans. In other words, they are out of the mainstream of thought. But again, there is no indication that he is violent or dangerous. And for his statement in Reveal that he sees “the election of President Trump as a precursor to white identity politics becoming an overt and welcome part of mainstream conversation in America for the first time,” is a red herring. How many pot-smoking, anti-establishment former “long haired hippie-type,” baby-boomers saw the election of former President, Bill Clinton, as way to re-establish their sixties’ radicalism? How many supporters of former President, Barack Obama, felt that, as America’s first black president, even though he was only half-black, they could undeniably declare their hatred for the United States of America and be given credence?

I can’t envision the current White Nationalist/neo-Nazi movement as anything to quake and shake over. In Charlottesville, the group “Unite the Right” had a permit to protest both Friday night and Saturday. It wasn’t until Saturday when Antifa and Black Lives Matter got into the mix that things deteriorated and one woman was killed. Yes, “Unite the Right” carried tiki torches and shouted pro-Nazi rhetoric on Friday night, and did the same, sans the tiki torches on Saturday. Had these white nationalists been left alone to protest the removal of Robert E Lee’s statute and the renaming of that park, I firmly believe they would have “done their thing” and dispersed.

Antifa has participated in many demonstrations where violence and the destroying of property and the injuring human beings was intentional. So has Black Lives Matter. And to the left, these groups should be given accolades because they dared to take on white nationalists who were legally parading around and chanting slogans, but not destroying property or injuring other people.

The average liberal might say to me, “the white nationalists, while marching in Klan-like fashion and chanting pro-Nazi rhetoric, even though they were not destroying property or physically injuring people, were offending many people to the point where their victims could be emotionally damaged for life.” Cry me a river. While I certainly don’t desire to downplay that people can be damaged by emotional abuse, particularly when the abuse comes from a loved one such as a parent or a spouse, or by situations of constant, over the years, bullying by peers or classmates, a couple of hours of listening to chants where you might be the subject of those chants, especially when you can leave the scene and not listen or watch anymore, pales in comparison.

Is it a sin to hate, even if the hate doesn’t manifest itself in the form of physical violence? Absolutely. Is it a sin to offend someone/hurt someone’s feelings? Absolutely again. We’re all going to be judged on these things one fine day, though. In the meantime, why are we wasting all this media time on white nationalist groups when most people can’t name even one specific group, and violence collectively by these groups doesn’t really exist? When, on the other hand, groups such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the Black Panthers, ISIS, etc. have histories of destroying property and injuring people, but the left, including the MSM, and even some conservatives tout these groups as being admirable?

Facebooktwitter

DEMOCRATS WHO CELEBRATE THE BIRTHDAY of MARTIN LUTHER KING ARE HYPOCRITES

With all this white privilege garbage being bantered around by the left and something new added to the definition of racism almost on an hourly basis, I was thinking about the words of Dr. Martin Luther King in his “I Have a Dream” speech.

While we’re five months away from celebrating Dr. King’s birthday, I can’t help but be saddened at how far away we have deviated from his dream.

In reviewing the text of his speech, I was searching for the following: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” “I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave-owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.”

In searching for the above, I also came across this: “We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protests to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force. The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. They have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone. And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We cannot turn our back.”

All my life, I have interpreted these words of Dr. King and the Civil Rights movement in its entirety to have as a goal a near color-blind society, where skin color is likened to hair color or eye color, used predominantly for identification purposes. Having said the above we can’t ignore the facts that the disease, sickle cell anemia strikes only blacks and melanoma/skin cancer strikes mostly whites.

Approximately 44 years after modern day civil rights legislation was passed, the United States of America elected its first black president, Barack Obama. I didn’t like Barack Obama, and I still don’t. He’s a Democrat and I don’t identify with Democrat party politics. I oppose the major expansion of government entitlement programs, including the government takeover of one-sixth of the nation’s economy (the health care industry). I oppose punishing and demonizing the wealthiest Americans just because they are rich, and don’t adhere to the Democrat theory that anybody who has money obtained it off the backs of those less fortunate. I believe that it is necessary to have a strong military to protect American citizens from the invasion of foreign regimes intent on destroying this country. I believe that it is necessary that Americans have the right to bear firearms in order to protect themselves from those who intend to harm. I could, of course, write more, but I’ll end it here.

But the fact that I, along with millions of others, didn’t like Barack Obama, doesn’t change the fact that in 2008, we elected a black president. This event should have signaled to the nation and the rest of the world that we’ve achieved a society in which skin color, with few exceptions, holds little more importance than hair color or eye color.

With blacks making up only 13% of the United States population, Barack Obama had to have some white votes to get elected.

After the 2008 election, and to some extent after the 2012 election, Obama supporters/Democrats demonstrated their hatred for those who didn’t march in lockstep with their policies regarding how this country should be governed. The typical Democrat rant went as follows: “You lost, get over it. We’re in charge now, we’re going to do what we’re going to do. We don’t care what you think.”

Instead of being proud that the nation’s first black president was a Democrat, and looking forward to the probability that their dreams of a socialist utopia would be closer to becoming a reality, Democrats/liberals/progressives displayed their fangs and claws in numerous attempts to “beat down” those on the other side of the political spectrum.

To be labeled a racist during this time was the worst thing that could happen to a person, something from which he or she would never survive. Thus, everyone took extreme measures to avoid having this label slapped on them.

Unlike former Democrat presidential candidate, Jesse Jackson, Barack Obama, during his campaign made it clear that the United States would no longer be a red country or a blue country. Instead it would be a purple country. He was going to be a president to all Americans. And that’s how it should be.

There was one little thing wrong with this. He didn’t mean it. From early on in his presidency, Obama flaunted his racism and disdain for those who weren’t in lockstep with what he wanted to accomplish as president. While most presidents, including previous president, George W. Bush, recognized that in America, we have the right to disagree with our leaders and the right to express those disagreements, Barack Obama vehemently resented all those who were against his governing philosophies.

The hate of Barack Obama toward his political opponents, gave license to the left wingers of this nation to continue the hate toward those who failed to toe their political line. Thus, anyone who didn’t go along with Obama and the Democrats was a racist. I witnessed the plight of many of my conservative friends attempting to explain to liberals that their differences with former President Barack Obama had nothing to do with his skin color, but where he stood on the issues facing this country. To these explanations, the left was deaf, dumb, and blind, continuing to hammer home that anyone who didn’t like or agree with Obama had to be a racist. Seeing that explaining to liberals about why I didn’t care for Obama was an exercise in futility, I simply referred them to this website and challenged them to find anywhere in any of my writings where I belittled Barack Obama because of the color of his skin. Of course, there are not any.

Even after visiting my blog and admitting there’s nothing in my writings where I’ve besmirched BHO with regard to his skin color, liberals will still accuse you of being a racist. They’ll say you’ve used certain “buzz” or “code” words that connect to racism. When a liberal does attempt to do this, I let him or her know that our conversation is now over. I don’t deal with “buzz words.” End of conversation.

Since the election of Donald Trump to the presidency and his subsequent inauguration, the left has been on a tear regarding not only racism, but sexism, homophobia, and xenophobia. And I understand that misogyny is the new term for sexism. White people are to acknowledge they are privileged because they are white and can’t possibly comment or have any opinions where race is concerned because they haven’t experienced the “black experience” or “the people of color” experience. It sounds like we’re on a collision course to punish white people, particularly white men and render whites powerless. Liberals seem to think that’s okay.

Tell a liberal that you don’t see things in terms of race and seek to judge people by the content of their character as opposed to the color of their skin and see what all things will get said to you. Here’s an example: “Nancy Graham do you feel better now telling us all you don’t see color? You’re a liar and that should make you feel kinda awful. Because you are awful.”

In recent months, we have witnessed a wave of accepted segregation from the left. According to the Washington Examiner, http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/black-lives-matter-group-bans-all-other-races-from-their-open-meeting/article/2619392, The Black Lives Matter organization based in Philadelphia created a public event on Facebook for a gathering they were hosting which they marketed as an “open meeting.” As many know, the supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement are very diverse. However, for the Philly chapter of BLM, their meetings and events are strictly “black spaces” according to their FB event announcement. When pressed via Twitter, the official account of BLM Philly explained that anyone is free to support the movement from a distance, however, their meetings are only for black people. They even cited Malcom X, the human’s rights activist who advocated for segregation.

And remember, Evergreen College, that liberal bastion in Washington state? The students sponsored a “Day of Absence & Day of Presence demonstration for which white students, faculty, and staff were asked to leave campus for one day. Biology professor, Bret Weinstein was berated by dozens of students outside his classroom on the day of the event for refusing to participate in the event.

It seems that liberals are poised to steer the American culture toward a culture that supports segregation and judging people by the color of their skin. It’s perfectly okay to call someone a racist, or for that matter, a misogynist, a xenophobe, homophobe, etc. with no concrete proof. We’re liberals, we’re superior, we make up definitions to suit our needs of the moment, and if we say you’re something, then you are. The end.

Dr. King said in “I Have a Dream,” “We must not allow our creative protests to degenerate into physical violence.” Well, so much for that. According to liberals, it is okay to riot, destroy property, injure, or even assassinate or murder when something happens that we don’t like.

“The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. They have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.” Again, so much for Dr. King’s dream. We’re now told that all white people, especially white males are evil. Even those who stand with us in our efforts to destroy property, injure, maim, and even kill, are not to be allowed in our inner circles. They must realize their evilness and submit to whatever punishments we wish to inflict upon them.

“We cannot walk alone. And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead.” This instruction from Dr. Martin Luther King is obviously out the window with the left advocating separation of the races and the banning of whites from anything and everything involving “people of color.”

And yet, in five months when Martin Luther King’s birthday rolls around, we’ll be treated to a sickening display of liberal leaders, including Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, Maxine Waters, Corey Booker, Keith Ellison, etc. singing the praises of Dr. King. I have a couple of close friends who are black and liberal. They will certainly attend the many local celebrations held in the Birmingham area.

The folks I mentioned above, including my friends are hypocrites, yes hypocrites. If you support what’s currently taking place in this nation with respect to race, you’re a hypocrite. You’re no better than George Wallace in his early years as governor of Alabama. You’re no better than Birmingham Police Commissioner, Bull Conner, of firehose and police dog fame. In fact, you exist on the same plane as the Ku Klux Klan. How can you even celebrate Dr. Martin Luther King’s birthday when you’re an advocate of today’s racial politics?

Wait! I know! You’re liberals, you have no scruples, no sense of fairness, no sense of wrong and right. It’s whatever suits your needs of the moment and gives you a euphoric complex of superiority. And anyone who dares to disagree with you…well, we know about that.

Facebooktwitter

LIBERALS HAVE THE MATURITY OF HIGH SCHOOL SOPHOMORES

Think back to your high school days, those days where the “cool crowd” ruled. The “cool crowd” consisted mostly of the athletes, beauty queens, the talented, those whose parents had money, and yes, maybe those who were extremely smart. Those not in the “cool crowd” were the students who were not the very talented, not the very beautiful, not the very athletic, etc. Even the teachers favored the students who were part of the “cool crowd,” often taking an interest in the top two or three in the class, to the detriment of the remainder of the other students. The students who were part of the “cool crowd” often mistreated those students were not a part of the “cool crowd,” often to the point of hurting them so much that they experienced difficulties later in life. I shouldn’t have to further illustrate this because you surely get my drift.

My high school graduating class currently has socials once a quarter. At a recent reunion, it was suggested by one of the class leaders that we put our petty issues behind us and go forward as a class and be there for one another. In a recent email, another class leader acknowledged that for some classmates, high school was not a pleasant experience, but urged those folks who may not have warm fuzzy feeling about their high school days to come back and be a part of the class.

Today’s liberals, even though they are well into adulthood, still have the maturity of high school sophomores. They think of themselves as the “cool crowd,” and often mistreat anyone who doesn’t have the same political philosophy as they do. I was purposefully not invited to a cousin’s wedding because of my political ideology. I have an alleged friend who entertains a lot, mostly dinner parties for her little clique. She’s a liberal and has never invited me to one of her little soirees because I’m a conservative and might embarrass her in front of her elitist friends. I also suspect that I was left out of an Aunt’s will because of my political philosophy. And if you’re wondering, I do have a few liberals in my family.

Liberals are nothing but bullies. As we all know, they don’t hesitate to call anyone who doesn’t agree with them names such as moron, idiot, clueless, dumb, mentally retarded (even though that term is not politically correct, except when it pertains to conservatives), etc.

Even though central Alabama is one of the major conservative strongholds, we do have liberals. And those liberals are likely to be nasty, hateful people, because they are in the minority, and they know it. But that doesn’t keep these liberals from acting like high school sophomores.

A guy who was a year ahead of me in high school requested friendship from me back in 2010. He was and still is very brilliant, and was one of those students who the teachers favored. Because he was a strong liberal, he, his liberal friends, and I often got into serious political discussions. Like all liberals, he is full of hate and abhors all who do not agree with him politically. After Donald Trump received the Republican nomination for president, this FB friend indicated that he would unfriend anyone who was a Trump supporter because of his hatred for Trump and Trump supporters. After indicating that I was a Trump supporter, he promptly unfriended me. If I were to ever meet up with this person face to face, I have no doubt he would be the same snooty elitist person toward me now as he was to me in high school, even though I was one of the smart, talented, and pretty students in my high school.

Another guy who was in my graduating class and one of the smart, elitist, teacher favorites in high school is now a big liberal and an educator in one of the liberal strongholds of the United States. Even though I was never FB friends with him, he was one of those who indicated that anyone who didn’t support the policies of Barack Obama was a racist. He was one of those folks who felt that all white people were born racist and because of that should give themselves lashes with a whip (well maybe not a whip, maybe a fly swatter) every night before going to sleep to atone for their racist indwelling. He and I had a back and forth on a mutual friend’s thread. In the end, I sent him a private message telling him just what I thought about him and his elitist self. I even went back to our high school days. Needless to say, he never responded back to me.

Does it sound like these individuals who I have discussed above never matured past high school? Or maybe you might say, well, these are examples of only a few of “not so nice” people, but not all liberals are like this. Wrong. That’s not what I’ve observed over the years that I’ve been observing the behavior of the left.

Look around. Get on liberal Internet forums and discussion threads. It’s not illegal to do that; nor is it illegal to make comments on these threads. It is very rare to find a liberal thread where four-letter words are not used on a regular basis. Donald Trump, Mike Pence, Jeff Sessions, Kellyanne Conway, and other administration officials and prominent Republicans are constantly trashed and called and accused of unspeakable things. Issues are never discussed, just all-out mud-slinging takes place on these forums. Calling people names, especially with regard to their looks and their actions? Sure sounds sophomoric to me.

And this failure by liberals to get over Hillary Clinton’s loss in her bid for the presidency is, perhaps, the most glaring example of the immature left. This reminds me of high school beauty pageants, particularly mine. With few exceptions, the winner was generally a surprise contestant. Judges for the pageant almost always lived outside the area; and thus, had no idea regarding the popularity of the young ladies competing for the crown. However, there were always two or three girls who were the favorites. One year, in my high school’s beauty pageant, a relatively unknown young woman was crowned, while one of the favorites, in a rage, attempted to storm off the stage when the winner was announced. Luckily the loser was corralled before it became obvious to the audience what was taking place. Spoiled and immature? Yep! The loser acted then just like liberals are acting now. There is one difference, though. The young lady who lost, like the rest of us, eventually grew up. The Hillary supports are adults who give the appearance of never having grown up.

Liberals are the true racists, bigots, hypocrites, liars, and haters. They don’t seem capable of discussing the issues. Instead, they resort to their name-calling, their hate, and their venom-spewing. Like the members of the “cool crowds,” common to all high schools, they think they can do anything and get by with it because they’re smart, beautiful, athletic, and talented. The teacher loved maybe the top five of them and couldn’t care less about the other students. So, they were allowed to get by with being snobby, often making the lives of other students miserable to the point that these students suffered difficulties later in life. However, what do they care?

Liberals don’t care about anything except themselves and controlling the lives of everyone else. They certainly don’t care about anyone’s happiness or well-being, unless, of course, you carry water for their leftist/socialist/communist agenda.
Liberals have only the maturity of high school students, and I don’t look for that to change anytime soon.

Facebooktwitter

LIBERAL HATE TAKES PRECEDENCE

On April 17, 2017, liberal New York Times columnist, Alan Rappeport, wrote an article entitled,Trump’s Unreleased Taxes Threaten Yet Another Campaign Promise. The following is a critique of portions of that article where I illustrate how liberals are so consumed with hatred for Donald Trump, his family, his administration, and his supporters that their hate takes precedence over everything else in their universe.

Mr. Rappeport writes that President Trump’s promise to enact a sweeping overhaul of the tax code is in serious jeopardy nearly 100 days into his tenure, and his refusal to release his tax returns is emerging as a central hurdle to another faltering campaign promise.

The president’s press secretary, Sean Spicer, has indicated that Mr. Trump has no intentions of releasing his tax returns to the public. While I am certainly aware that it has been custom and practice for presidents to make their tax returns available to the public, it is not a constitutional requirement that presidents or presidential candidates do so. This is something that liberals cannot seem to comprehend. Moreover, since they cannot seem to distinguish between an actual requirement and something that is done out of courtesy, I have my doubts that any liberal is capable of reviewing a tax return and understanding it.

Because the president is not releasing his tax returns, Democrats are uniting around a pledge not to cooperate on any rewriting of the tax code unless they know specifically how that revision would benefit the president and his family.
Senate Minority Leader, Chucky Schumer, has pointed out that the president has significant conflicts of interest on issues such as taxation of the real estate industry and the elimination of the estate tax. It’s in his own self-interest, says Schumer.

According to Rappeport, more than 100,000 of Trump’s critics took to the streets over the weekend before the deadline to file tax returns and pay taxes, demanding that the president’s tax returns be released. The protesters say that tax legislation could be a plot by Donald Trump to get even richer.

Ezra Levin, a member of the Tax March executive committee, whatever that is, has questioned…”When they talk about tax reform, are they talking about cutting Donald Trump’s taxes by millions of dollars a year?”

Mr. Rappeport, in his article, states that lawmakers to want to pass an overhaul of the tax code that unwittingly enriches the commander and chief and his progeny.

This article informs me that Democrats will be against any sort of tax reform/tax cutting that would benefit the president and his family. It does not matter how much the new tax reform policies might help everyday Americans such as you and me, including middle-class Democrats. It’s obvious that in the eye of liberals, hate takes precedence over anything that might be good for this country or for individual Americans.

The above illustrates overwhelming, beyond the pale hate by liberals/Democrats/progressives or whatever they want to call themselves toward Donald Trump, his family, his administration, and his supporters. Rappeport indicates that Republicans are arguing that Democrats are putting politics ahead of an opportunity to fix a broken tax system. I think that Republicans should shout from the highest mountains that Democrats are so full of hate for anyone who does not toe their line that they are willing to deep-six the needs of the American people because of their deranged, sick hatred.

I want meaningful tax reform, particularly in the area of capital gains taxes. I would also like to see the corporate tax rate cut so that the nation’s businesses can expand and create more jobs. Again, liberals say that they will fight any tax reform measure that would benefit Donald Trump. Their hate takes precedence over everything else.

Well, I don’t care if Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Chucky Schumer, Bill and Hillary Clinton, the Kennedy’s, etc. benefit from tax reform, I just want to benefit from tax reform, and I want the American people, those who pay taxes, to benefit from tax reform.

Because of the seething hate that’s in their hearts for Donald Trump, his family, his administration, and his supporters, liberals will cut off their noses to spite their faces. Just when I think liberals cannot get any more dangerous, they do.

Facebooktwitter

MORE LIBERAL HATE – THE WHITE HOUSE EASTER EGG ROLL

The annual White House Easter Egg Roll is an event that has taken place either on Easter Sunday or the following Monday. Traditionally, it is planned by the current first lady and her staff. From the believable accounts that I have read regarding this year’s event, it was a success.

However, leave it to the liberals and their absolute hatred toward President Donald Trump to pick apart every little detail of this historic event.

Planning the Easter Egg Roll generally falls to the first lady and the East Wing of the White House. Of course, liberals did not waste any time disparaging the new administration regarding the planning and organizing.

The first thing we heard from the left in their quest to trash the current administration, was that the wooden egg manufacturer, Maine’s Wells Wood Turning, had to gently remind the White House that the deadline for ordering the eggs was approaching. From what I could piece together, the company, Wells Wood Turning send a tweet asking the first lady and the administration to please reach out. Duh! If you are trying to get in touch with someone and it is an emergency, you do not exclusively use Twitter; you utilize all forms of communication including pre-historic methods such as telephone calls and emails. You can also resort to Facebook messages, texting, and finally Twitter. The fact that Twitter may have been used exclusively is suspect. Was this Maine company actually making an effort to get in touch with the administration, particularly, the East Wing?

Next, the liberals just had to make something out of Melanie nudging the President, prompting him to place his right hand over his heart when the national anthem was played. What woman has not had to prompt her man to do something he should be doing? I thought it was funny. This little incident brought back a memory when Vice President Al Gore and his wife, Tipper were attending some event. Al Gore, along with a couple of other folks were recognized. The Vice President started clapping, but Tipper whispered to him, “You’re not supposed to clap for yourself.” I thought this was hilarious, and feel the same way about Melania having to nudge the president to put his hand over his heart. However, the liberals, with their out of control hatred for Donald Trump, his family, his administration, and his supporters, spent much time exacerbating this incident to the point of ridiculousness.

Then we have the incident where it has been alleged by the ‘capable of nothing but sheer hatred’ liberals, that the president signed a “Make American Great Again” baseball cap passed to him by a young boy wanting the president’s autograph. Supposedly, president tossed it into the crowd, instead of handing it to the boy. I read one account from British media that the young man requesting the autograph did catch the cap. I then read about other incidents where the president signed caps and tossed them into the crowd instead of passing them to the original owners. I have not been able to get much information on this except from the far-left smear merchant websites. Perhaps the right-leaning websites considered it too unimportant to write about.
Why this may have happened, I do not know. I am not a popular person. In fact, I am not very well liked by many individuals in and around the Birmingham, Alabama and central Alabama areas. While this area is one of the biggest conservative strong-holds in the nation, we do have liberals. And because they are in the minority, they have extra hate in their hearts. So, I do not know and will probably ever know what it feels like to have a multitude of folks vying for my autograph. Would I get confused if that ever happened to me? I don’t know. The far-left smear merchant websites even some of the left-leaning MSM sites wrote their articles indicating that Donald Trump knew exactly what he was doing and was intentionally doing it to intentionally bully the young boy.

When you think about it, it just doesn’t sound right. In fact, I would not even accuse Barack Obama of doing something like that. Yes, Barack Obama hated the United States of America and had as his goal to destroy this country, I think with children, he would not have done something like this.

The next thing the liberals brought out regarding the Easter Egg Roll was that there were an overwhelming number of white children attending. Liberals were indicating that children attending the Washington D.C. public schools, where the majority of the students are black weren’t invited to the Egg Roll. Even some teachers in the D.C. public schools went on record as saying their classes were not invited.

After doing a little investigating, I found out that invitation to D.C. public school students is done by lottery. Now that this year’s Egg Roll is over, the White House website has loaded a page where groups or individuals can sign up for the lottery. While the date for the 2018 Egg Roll has not been announced, instructions for entering the lottery were given. The web page further indicated that Easter Egg Roll tickets were free and were made available via an online lottery March 15 – 18. Easter Egg Roll Lottery (2018 dates not announced yet). I also found an article on the Washington Post website dated March 15, apparently 2017, indicating that “the online lottery for the popular White House Easter Egg Roll opens Wednesday. White House Easter Egg Roll lottery opens today.

I was also able to find an article from dcpcsb.org indicating that the President and First Lady Michelle Obama have invited 250 students from D.C. charter schools to attend this year’s White House Easter Egg Roll on April 25. The article went on to indicate that the C.D. Public Charter School Board recommended the schools based on their progress in increasing student achievement and incorporating programs that promote health and wellness. Five D.C. Charter Schools Invited to the White House Easter Egg Roll.

With this article, I have haven’t connected all the dots, but it looks as though liberals are doing what they said they would do after the object of their worship lost the presidential election…fight President Donald Trump tooth and nail on anything his administration attempts to accomplish, even to the detriment of the well-being of the United States of America and the American people. In other words, the liberals do not care if they damage this country or hurt their fellow Americans, it is all about hate and destroying those who do not agree with them and refuse to toe the liberal line.

It pays to do a little investigating, doesn’t it?

Facebooktwitter