Category Archives: General Politics

STORY ABOUT THE NFL – HOW IMPORTANT IS IT?

Throughout social media, people are questioning the news media’s covering of the NFL Story regarding multiple players refusing to stand while the National Anthem is played before football games. The coverage has been almost non-stop, and as one would expect, with the exception of Fox News and One America News, the media is taking the side that it’s perfectly okay to kneel for the National Anthem in protest of a cruel United States of America with a history of slavery and oppression of minorities.

When President Trump came out of Friday night, September 22, at a rally in Huntsville, Alabama, advising NFL team owners that they should fire “those SOBs who refuse to stand for the anthem,” a widespread movement swept among the players to kneel when the anthem was played.

Many folks are now boycotting the NFL and as you can imagine, there have been “opinions galore” out there. For the record, here’s mine. I blame the owners for allowing this kerfuffle to escalate to the extent it has. These players signed contracts with their respective teams, and when you sign a contract of employment, no matter what you position is, you agree to do what your employer tells you to do. The owners could have told the players, “stand for the National Anthem or be fired.” The end! But they didn’t. They wimped out.

While, of course, the players are to be held accountable for their actions and will certainly suffer repercussions, they are young men, many of them under the age of twenty-five. And they’re millionaires to boot. Groomed since childhood to be football stars, they held press conferences while in high school to announce the college they had chosen. Once they got on campus, they became the most popular guys on campus. In some states, such as my own, they became the most important people in the state, being loved, adored, and looked up to by many. After being drafted and signing multi-million-dollar contracts, they played football, and continued to be everyone’s darling. Pretty heady stuff.

Playing for an NFL team is hard work. Practices are grueling and pressure is never ending. These players are not your average twenty-four-year-old college graduates who are trying to “make it” in fields such as accounting, computer science, teaching, banking, etc. Do they watch the news, do they regularly visit news websites? Probably not. Majority of these players are black and many came from poor families. Furthermore, when someone tells them that the United States of America is a cruel racist country, and that’s why there are so many people living under the poverty line, many of them minorities, these players want to be seen as doing something good, plus they’re young and idealistic. They also want to fit in, to be popular with their peers. Thus, I put more of the blame on the owners and NFL management for allowing this to happen.  Like Bill O’Reilly said last night, it’s “pack mentality.” Also, many are not mature enough to think through what their actions might lead to down the road.

Having said all of the above, I’m also reading articles where many folks are complaining, saying that we have much more important stuff to cover and obsess on instead of football; things such as the damages and continued suffering of those affected by the recent hurricanes, plus “Little Rocket Man” on the other side of the world threatening to annihilate all of us. And let’s not forget the terrorist attack on a small church in Antioch, Tennessee where a gunman from the Sudan killed a woman church-goer in the parking lot and injured others, shooting until he was subdued by another church-goer with a carry permit and a gun. The mainstream media would not have covered the church shooting story anyway, because a black Islamic terrorist shooting at, killing and injuring white Christians, particularly southern white Christians is just not newsworthy, nor did it trigger widespread riots, looting, and allegations of police brutality.

I beg to differ with those who think the NFL story is immaterial in the wake of what else is taking place in the country and in the world.

The NFL and sports in general have always been large parts of our culture where all people regardless of financial status, social status, religion, ethnicity, ideology, etc. could come together for fun, and fellowship. The ultra-liberal sitting next to you in the stands wants the same thing as you want…for your team to win. As the United States of America becomes more polarized with respect to how we should govern ourselves now and in the future, the sports culture, where historically politics didn’t exist, has become increasingly important as a refuge and a uniting mechanism.

As I watched the left go nuclear at the president’s comments, calling him a racist (the media calling the president a racist…what else is new), when he didn’t even mention race or skin color in his remarks, followed by Roger Goodell’s actions and the team owners’ actions, it became all too apparent that this whole melee was being fueled by the left with its systematic methodologies to destroy the United States of America by vaporizing its history, including the constitution, and destroying its culture, institution by institution.

The organizers of the leftist movement to annihilate the United State of America, have now seen an opportunity to break up one of the nation’s cultural bastions, the National Football League. There have been calls for boycotting, not just the games, but boycotting NFL sponsors. And TV ratings have been down.  If the fans lose interest, income will go down, the owners will suffer, and eventually the players will suffer, not to mention all the people who work for the NFL and NFL teams in various capacities from grounds keepers, secretaries, accountants, etc. This could very well lead to a recession, especially if the left continues to attack and destroy other institutions.

Like Bill O’Reilly said last night on Hannity, left not only wants to destroy President Trump, they want to destroy his supporters, and they want to destroy the United States of America and build it back up according to their specifications, starting with a new constitution, the abolishment of the electoral college, the abolishment the three branches of government and the system of checks and balances. And who can predict what else. It’s “1984,” folks.

On Hannity last night, I noticed a slight apprehension that pervaded the Bill O’Reilly segment. Sean and Bill were both critical of the main stream media reiterating that it was as corrupt as it’s ever been. With what our young people are being taught in the public schools, or not being taught in the public schools, they have no knowledge of this country and its history, except that America has allowed the institution of slavery and continues to oppress minorities. Furthermore, since the end of the cold war, they have not been taught or nor have they seen the evils of communism and the effects of socialism. Thus, many millennials think communism and socialism are good philosophies as compared to the evils of capitalism in which we now live under.

How can this happen when the Republicans have the house, the Senate, and the presidency? I’ll tell you how, the far left has the press, a press that lives to denigrate President Trump every day, a press that promotes the lies, the hatred, the bigotry and the hypocrisy emanating from the left. If the only news that you watch are snippets of the network news or a few minutes of CNN or MSNBC, all you hear is “Russia, Russia, Russia,” Trump’s a racist, Trump’s a misogynist, Trump’s a homophobe, all Trump cares about are his wealthy friends, his supporters are ignorant, especially those southern white conservative Christians.

With a corrupt media, that promotes the left and lies about the right.  a large segment of the population that knows nothing about the cold war and the evils of communism, and conservatives who are scared of their own shadows who tremble at the thought of being called a racist, we can easily lose this nation. This is no laughing matter.

Facebooktwitter

WHITE SUPREMACY AND ITS AFFECT ON THIS COUNTRY

I shouldn’t have to tell any of my readers about the Charlottesville, Virginia melee that took place last weekend, particularly on Friday night and during the day on Saturday (8-11-2017 and 8-12-2017). It started with a white supremacist/white nationalist group, calling themselves “Unite the Right,” obtaining a permit to protest the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee and the renaming of the park where the statue was located to Emancipation Park from Lee Park.

I viewed videos from Friday night where protesters were carrying tiki torches and shouting Nazi/anti-Jewish slogans. As far as I know, there was no violence resulting in property damage or bodily injury on Friday night. Saturday, or course was a different story as Unite the Right was met by liberal hate groups ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter. Both liberal hate groups have a history of violence. The protest didn’t end well with a young lady who was protesting on the side of the liberal groups being run-down and killed by an alleged member of Unite the Right as he plowed his vehicle into a group of the liberal protesters. In addition to the death of the young lady, nineteen others were injured.

Stories continue to surface. One such story indicates that the Charlottesville Police were told to stand down and let the groups involved in Saturday’s melee oppose each other. Another story that has been revealed by the Southern Poverty Law Center indicated that James Alex Fields, Jr., the driver of the car that plowed into the protestors had, until recently, been an Obama supporter and a far left radical.

Again, I don’t have to tell anyone about the backlash coming from the left and the mainstream media regarding their dissatisfaction with the comments of President Donald Trump in the aftermath of Charlottesville. Most all Democrats and some Republicans have pushed back against the president because he has blamed both sides for the fracas, and also indicated that there were good people on both sides. Furthermore, most all Democrats and some Republicans have elevated the left-wing hate groups, ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter to blameless entitles, indicating that they were lovingly protesting the racist white supremacy group, not seeming to “get” that everyone was going at one another, and ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter have histories of violence.

I have had very little contact with white supremacists. Liberals would be astonished at this since I grew up in Cullman, Alabama and currently live in the Birmingham, Alabama area. But it’s true. Back in the nineties, I was working at a concession stand at the Birmingham, Jefferson Civic Center Coliseum to make money for a service club in which I belonged. One evening, while I was working, about three or four people who looked to be in their twenties/early thirties, who were adorned with swastika tattoos, were just kind of hanging out close to our stand.  I was a bit un-nerved and hoped they would move on. They eventually did, but it took them a while. To be perfectly truthful, they were not disruptive, they were just there.  Still, I didn’t want them close to me.

I don’t know who these people are, what they do for a living, what they do in their spare time, etc. But I can tell you this, cross-burnings are not regular occurrences in my neck of the woods. Also, I don’t hear about cross-burnings in other parts of the country. Cross-burnings do not appear to be common like liberals would have you think. Black neighborhoods, at least those around here, aren’t terrorized by white supremacists/Nazis/the KKK. But many black neighborhoods, particularly in Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, etc. are being terrorized on a regular basis. Are they being terrorized by White Supremacists? No, they are being terrorized by other blacks, particularly black gangs. While I haven’t researched this, I’m going to speculate that more blacks are killed by other blacks than by white supremacists. Are Jews rounded up and transported to labor/death camps by these people? Not that I know of.

A few days ago, I heard some talking head had indicated that the number of white supremacists/neo-Nazis/white nationalists in this country numbered about 100,000. That’s less that the seating capacity of Bryant Denny Stadium. This is miniscule.

What are these people like? Are they bitter old white men? Are they twenty-somethings who still live in their parents’ basement and frequent Internet porn sites? Do they meet once a month and chant their racist and anti-Semitic slogans in some farmer’s cornfield? I really don’t know.

What I do know is that they’re not major causes of trouble such as violence, damaging property and injuring people. Other groups such as ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter do those sorts of things.

Yes, a possible white supremacy group demonstrated in Charlottesville the weekend of 8/11 and 8/12. Are they planning other demonstrations, particularly soon? I’m hearing that’s a possibility. Are these folks transitioning from a bunch of misfits, who possibly visit Internet porn sites, and possibly chant racist and anti-Semitic slogans once a month in cornfields, to violent demonstrators who clash with liberal hate groups such as Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA?

If this is indeed happening, it’s all the fault of liberals in the United States of America and their hate groups. And let’s not forget the mainstream media.  Liberals are responsible for bringing these white supremacy groups to the forefront. Liberals, who are about nothing but hate and have as their goal the destruction of the United States of America are the ones who are elevating groups such as ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter to heroes because these groups, in the name of combating racism, are opposing a minuscule and rather silent, but dangerous segment of the United States population.

Liberals hate the middle class and seek to destroy it. They don’t want low energy prices, they don’t want lower taxes, they don’t want the United States to be a rich, prosperous nation. And they certainly don’t want those citizens who have worked hard to have a little money in the bank or in their portfolios to continue to prosper. They want to destroy those folks, because somewhere in their deranged minds, if you have worked hard and have a little something set aside, you must have cheated to get it, you must have stepped on someone else. Therefore, what you have must be taken away from you.

As of this writing, a “Freedom of Speech” rally was held in Boston, this past Saturday, 8/19/2017. The group holding the rally stated that they were not affiliated with the KKK in any way. From the news reports that have come out, the liberal hate group, ANTIFA came out to counter the freedom of speech rally. ANTIFA counter protesters significantly outnumbered the “Freedom of Speech,” marchers, labeled as a conservative group by the press, including Fox Cable News. It was also revealed that the ANTIFA counter protesters were responsible for the violent acts against the “Freedom of Speech” folks and law enforcement who were there to maintain order.

Whether these “Freedom of Speech” marchers were affiliated with the Klan or other white supremacy  groups, I don’t know. But these groups are not necessarily visible to the American public. They haven’t occupied “news time” in the last few years like the terrorist hate group, Black Lives Matter, has. But the left, in their hatred for anyone who does not toe their line, including their hatred for President Trump and his supporters, may have lit a match under a “powder keg,” unlocking what was once a “below the radar” group. Thus, continuing to divide the United States of America, in hopes of destroying this great country, the country who gave them the freedoms to express their philosophies on how we should govern ourselves, the country who gave them the right to dissent, something they now consider patriotic, but declared racist when Barack Obama was president.

As I have previously indicated in my writings, when an alleged white supremacy group is involved, it is the crimes and actions of the white nationalist group that must be condemned. If groups such as ANTIFA or Black Lives Matter are involved, they cannot be mentioned because, according to the left, and some on the right, if the purpose of ANTIFA/BLM is to counter the white supremacy or neo-Nazi group, they are acting for a noble and holy cause. Forget the fact that both ANTIFA and BLM have histories of violence.

Yes, forget the above facts because liberals don’t care about facts, nor do they care about the truth.

Facebooktwitter

LIBERAL NATURE NEVER CHANGES

As a political writer, I often interject myself into liberal threads, mostly on Facebook. While there are some folks who think that people should stay off threads/forums where their views differ from most the folks posting on that thread/forum, I disagree. It’s a “freedom of speech thing.” You have the right to your opinion, even though the left in this country doesn’t think so.

When you get on a primarily liberal thread/forum, you’re going to get trashed, called names, and insulted because that’s what the left does and that’s all the left knows how to do. They’re losers on the issues, so all they can do when you post facts and statistics is call you names, hoping disrupt your train of thought and scare you off of “their thread.” When liberals start belittling you personally, you’re winning. When they call you a racist, you’ve won the debate, hands down. It’s the liberal nature, the nature of the beast. As I’ve indicated many times on this blog, liberals make up the definition of racism as they go along to whatever suits their needs of the moment.

Liberals have a hard time with reading comprehension. In other words, they can’t seem to understand what they read. On almost every liberal thread I visit, I have to explain at least two times, if not more, the point I was trying to make. The question is: do they really not understand what I’m saying or are they trying to throw me off subject because they can’t possibly win an argument with me? I’m guessing the latter.

We all know that liberals are haters. They hate the new President of the United States, Donald Trump. They hate his family, they hate his administration, and they hate his supporters, including me, and including you. They’re also hypocrites. And you know what? They don’t care. They loathe you so much that they don’t think they’re accountable to you. They don’t have to justify their hypocrisy. They don’t’ have to justify their lawlessness to you. They don’t have to justify anything they do to you because you’re so stupid, and you’re such nothings. That’s liberal nature.

There have been a number of weekends, since his inauguration, where the president has traveled to his resort property, Mar-a-Lago in Florida, for a working weekend. In fact, I don’t think that the president has taken a full day off since he took the oath of office. Yet the liberals continue to beat the drum that these working weekends were vacations. He has played some golf, but it is unknown whether he finished games or just teed-off and left to do other things. It seems as though liberals have forgotten Obama’s golf outings, his date nights with Michelle in the Big Apple, and his and the former first lady’s many vacations. Furthermore, President Trump has indicated that he would pay for his and the family’s vacations. Of course, we’ll have to see if that happens. While I’m a Trump supporter, I’ve also followed politics for over a quarter of a century and feel that I know the nature of politics on both sides of the spectrum, and sometimes it’s not always on the up and up.

I have to admit that I have a hard time wrapping my arms around liberal nature, or what liberals really espouse, which is the total control over all of our lives because they think we’re too stupid to make intelligent decisions. Who says all of our decisions have to be intelligent ones? And where do they get off on thinking the decisions they make are intelligent ones?

When friends ask me for my opinion on certain serious matters relating to their own lives, I always respond, indicating that the decision should be their decision, not mine. If I make the decision for them and it turns out to be a wrong decision, then it’s all my fault. If they make the decision, then it’s their decision and they will have to live with it, without blaming me. If I advise someone to spend $100 on a dress, they do it, and end up not liking the dress, they’re only out $100. But if someone asks me whether or not they should break up with a boyfriend or divorce a spouse, the friend has to make that decision, not me. That’s a biggie.

Back to liberal nature, liberals think they know what’s best for you…how you should invest and spend your money, what health insurance coverages you should choose, what you eat, what you drive, what setting your thermostat should be, etc.

I indicated above that liberals are incapable of comprehending what they read or hear on the news. They are always going to think that working weekends by the president at Mar-a-Lago are vacations. They are always going to think that any questioning of the effectiveness of a government entitlement program means you hate the poor and hate minorities. They are always going to think that the reason you didn’t support former President Barack Obama’s policies is because you hate him because of the color of his skin. When you indicate that you think illegal aliens should be deported and, as a nation, we should crack down on illegal immigration, liberals are never going to recognize the difference between legal and illegal immigration, and accuse you of being against all immigration. They will never agree to the originalist view of the constitution, and they will never agree to obeying laws they don’t like.

The above are just a few examples of liberal nature. They’re never going to agree to look at both sides of issues, even though the definition of liberalism includes the ability to examine all factors of an issues.

So, why even enter a discussion on a liberal thread or forum? To make them mad. To reinforce that you’re right and that they are wrong. To let them accuse you of all sorts of falsehoods and egregious things. Then keep records of what they say to you, and use those records to further illustrate their unfathomable hatred of you, the president, conservatives, and anyone who does not agree with them. Keep throwing it at them and continue to expose their liberal nature.

If they’re never going to change their opinions or jettison their intense hate, why bother? Because we have to, the future of this nation depends on exposing their un-American rhetoric and promoting our patriotism.

Facebooktwitter

LIBERALS ON ALAN COLMES

Fox Cable News personality, Alan Colmes, passed away on Thursday, February 23, 2017 after a brief illness. Alan will best be remembered as the liberal side of popular Fox News program, Hannity & Colmes which aired from 1996 to 2009.

Source: Peter Kramer/Getty Images

Source: Peter Kramer/Getty Images

Hannity &Colmes, along with The O’Reilly Factor were the first two shows I watched on FNC after my cable provider began offering FNC in late 2000. I was attracted to Hannity & Colmes because both sides were presented. I was just as much the conservative in 2000 as I am now. Alan was likable, but always wrong and it was obvious that the show was geared so that the conservative, Sean Hannity always got the upper hand. I always surmised that Alan was paid lots of money for that.

On the day that Alan passed away, I was out, and didn’t learn of his untimely death until late afternoon. I teared up. And it just so happened that I was thinking about Alan a few days before his death and wondered if there would ever be a chance that he and Sean would get together again.

That evening, I watched some of the tributes to Alan from a few the Fox News personalities. Even though most of these folks are conservative, you could tell that they were genuinely saddened by Alan’s death. Because Sean Hannity was at CPAC, Kimberly Guilfoyle was sitting in for him on Hannity. At the end of the show, Sean called in to talk about Alan. You could tell that he was in tears. Despite their political differences, the two were friends.

Of course, I couldn’t help but wonder what other liberals would say about Alan’s death. I had heard that many didn’t like him because he worked for Fox News. And while I couldn’t find anything after a few minutes of googling, I seem to remember that former President Barack Obama once chastised Alan because he worked for Fox News.  One of things I recall Sean mentioning is his on-air tribute to Alan was that Alan loved the Fox News, and I do remember Alan taking up for FNC when others would besmirch the network.

While I posted from the Wing Nut Gal Facebook page a blurb extending my sympathies to Alan’s family and shared it with my person FB friends, I do not remember seeing any liberal FB friends posting anything about Alan. Though, one liberal FB friend like my post.

Slate.com, the afternoon of Alan’s death posted an article entitled, Alan Colmes, Buffoon and Patsy, was Fox News’ Original Liberal Weakling. What a hateful title! Just another reason why liberals are the real haters in this country.

The article first dissed those on FNC who paid tribute to Alan, indicating that they were believable because “Colmes was the most absurd, useless, and mocked television personality in America for many years, precisely because he was nice.” Slate further indicated that not only was Alan a buffoon and a patsy, he played the role to perfection. As if the above wasn’t enough to demonstrate hate, Slate went on to describe the Hannity & Colmes show as a dreadful, morally bankrupt, Foxified version of Crossfire (a CNN show), that ran for a dozen years and birthed the even more dreadful and morally bankrupt Hannity. Slate also described Hannity & Colmes, as racist, homophobic, and Islamophobic.

While it was obvious that Alan was to often “stand down” and let Sean get in the last word, the words Slate used to describe Alan’s role on the show were egregiously over the line. Patsy, buffoon? Not hardly.

Alan’s leaving Hannity & Colmes coincided with the inauguration of President Barack Obama in January, 2009. FNC indicated that Alan wanted to do more with his radio show, and Sean was given his own show. Alan continued to do guest appearances, more notable appearing with sister-in-law, Monica Crowley, on Bill O’Reilly’s, “Barack and a Hard Place” segment. Slate indicated that this was a demotion. That’s unknown.

Slate went on to indicate that Alan made liberals look dumb, and to millions of Americans, Alan Colmes was liberalism. Alan certainly didn’t make liberals look dumb. Though, in my opinion, Alan made liberals look nice when the left-leaning media outlets were making liberals look not so nice. Alan was a top-notch example of a liberal and liberalism. Isaac Chotiner, the author of this piece did say that Alan was not a complete moron because he was smart enough to know he was being used, but took the money that his services demanded.

Chotiner ended the article by saying that we can mourn the fact that Alan won’t be around to watch the political era that he, as an important cog in the Fox News machine, helped to usher in, but the rest of us have no choice. Could Chotiner possibly be partially blaming Alan Colmes for Hillary’s defeat and Donald Trump’s victory?

While I have heard no liberals other than the ones on FNC, and there are liberals who work for FNC, comment on Alan Colmes’ death, the article that is the subject of this post exudes more hate for Alan, now that he’s no longer with us, than I can fathom.

Alan, you deserve better from your fellow liberals. Rest in Peace.

Facebooktwitter

ANALYSIS OF A LIBERAL RANT

I was the only conservative participant on a liberal thread that lasted for approximately three days. And yes, I was piled upon. But what else is new? One of entries read as follows:

“This whole thread is one of the best examples I could show of the stubborn, stick-your-head-in-the-sand, I’m going to stick to my rhetoric even though it hurts me mindset of the average conservative. They will blindly follow a leader who will pass legislation that is against their economic and social interests—and praise him for doing so. They will apply a double-standard and call it even-handed. They will listen to complete idiots, regurgitate what they hear, and refuse to think for themselves. They will tie themselves in knots trying to make things sound like equivalencies when there are, in fact, no parallels. And then they will call it God’s will.”

Typical liberal rant? I’d say so.

Of course, this person was referring to me. I was called stubborn and accused of sticking my head in the sand. In other words, I have my belief system and convictions in place. Because, I’m a bit mystified by the next phrase, “I’m going to stick to my rhetoric even though it hurts me mindset,” I’m going to skip over it and assume it has something to do with my stubbornness and sticking my head in the sand.

The author of this liberal rant further says that conservatives will blindly follow a leader who will pass legislation that it against their economic and social interests and then praise them for doing so. If I recall, candidate Donald Trump was a joke to many Republicans upon announcing his run for the presidency. In fact, he was to me. He wasn’t my first choice as the Republican nominee.

Upon his winning of the nomination, I supported him. No way was I going to support Hillary Clinton. As I’ve written many times, I had concerns about Donald Trump because Trump was a businessman who had never worked in the public sector. The public and private sectors are two “different animals.” I wasn’t sure that businessman, Donald Trump, who always got what he wanted within the confines of his business, would adapt to the public sector where getting things done takes time and opposition is forever present. While most Republicans by election day had boarded the “Trump train,” there were holdouts. In summary, some people supported Donald Trump from the day he announced his run. As candidate Trump campaigned, more and more Republicans cast their fates with Donald Trump. The author of the subject liberal rant said conservatives blindly follow. Doesn’t sound like blind following to me. In fact, Republicans often disagree on issues. It’s the Democrats who blindly follow their leaders, especially Barack Hussein Obama, like sheep being led to the slaughter house. I labeled Obama supporters, “Obama zombies” because of their blind loyalty in supporting everything he did and their attitude that Barack Obama could do no wrong.

This commenter didn’t stop there, he/she extended the “blindly follow a leader” sentence to insinuate that even though legislation passed by the leader they follow blindly is not in their best interests, they follow that leader anyway. A common characteristic of most liberals is that think they know what’s better for you than you do. Excuse me, but I don’t think you do.

“They will apply a double-standard and call it even-handed:” The commenter is probably referring to my citing that after the Obama wins, liberals were saying, “Get over it, you lost, we don’t care what you think, we’re going to do what we’re going to do.” I don’t think I’ve uttered this directly to any liberals, but I have not hesitated to remind them of what they said to us following the 2008 and 2012 elections. I’ve also reminded liberals that they called people who were not Obama supporters and did not support his policies racists. Fast-forward to 2016 and they’re now saying that descent is okay. And of course, it is. But when Republicans do it, it is somehow racists or un-American, but when Democrats do it, it’s okay.

Indicating that conservatives will listen to complete idiots and regurgitate what they hear, refusing to think for themselves is utter nonsense. I already touched on this portion of this liberal rant. Conservatives/Republicans often have differences because they are thinking for themselves.

“They will tie themselves in knots trying to make things sound like equivalencies when there are, in fact, no parallels.” What things?

“And then they call it God’s will.” As those of you who regularly read my articles, I’m often mention God, along with my Christian faith. On this thread, I did indicate, that while I was disturbed at the path the United States seemed to be taking, I knew that God was in control. The mention of God to many liberals throws them into all sorts of conniptions.

I chose this liberal rant because it is vicious, but doesn’t use foul language. While I hope it amuses you, I also hope it will serve to give you fodder if you find yourself in a “discussion” with a liberal.

Facebooktwitter